theSIGNAL TECHNOLOGY
1 July 2026
"Whoever controls the platform controls the market."
Photo: William Hook / Unsplash
A smartphone displaying app store icons, representing the platform competition now under UK regulatory scrutiny.
💸
30%
Maximum commission Apple and Google charge on in-app purchases
Discuss
  • Why might a 30% commission fee be considered unfair to both developers and consumers?
  • Google says it has already made the required changes. Does acting early give a company a strategic advantage with regulators?
  • Should governments have the power to tell private companies how much they can charge for using their platforms?
  • If steering fees are still permitted, how would you decide whether a fee is 'fair' or simply a renamed version of the old commission?
Technology

UK Regulator Breaks Open Apple and Google's App Store Grip

Britain's competition watchdog is moving to end the duopoly that forces developers to pay up to 30% commission on every in-app purchase.

At any given moment, when a British Spotify listener wants to subscribe to a music streaming service, they cannot do so through their iPhone app. Instead, they must leave their phone, open a laptop, and sign up through a website — a deliberate detour engineered not by Spotify but by Apple's fee structure. That friction, multiplied across millions of users and thousands of apps, is precisely what the UK's Competition and Markets Authority is now moving to dismantle. The CMA has formally challenged what it calls an "effective duopoly" held by Apple and Google over mobile platforms, noting that at least 90% of UK mobile devices run on one of their two operating systems.

The watchdog is consulting on rules that would allow app developers to "steer" users — that is, to direct them toward external websites where purchases can be completed without passing through Apple's App Store or Google's Play Store. Both companies currently charge commissions of up to 30% on transactions made within apps, a levy that critics argue is passed directly to consumers through higher prices. The significance of the proposed change reaches well beyond Britain. Will Hayter, the CMA's executive director for digital markets, argued that introducing competitive pressure into this part of the mobile ecosystem is "the best way" to address a market that is "sorely lacking" it.

Google has already said it implemented the required changes, including permitting apps to redirect users to alternative payment methods.

//
This is not only because choice is inherently valuable but also because we see this as the best way to introduce some competitive pressure in a vital part of the mobile ecosystem that is otherwise sorely lacking such pressure.
Will Hayter, Executive Director for Digital Markets, Competition and Markets Authority
Technology

NASA's Mars Rover May Go to Moon

When NASA administrator Jared Isaacman asked what would happen if a Mars-ready rover were sent to the Moon instead, the answer surprised almost everyone. The rover, named Promise and built by JPL engineers at considerable public expense, was designed for Martian terrain — yet engineers believe it can be modified for lunar use. …
  • Should nations prioritise Moon bases over deeper planetary exploration right now?
Technology

Apple's App Store Fees Face Global Scrutiny

When a Fortnite player buys a digital costume — a "skin" worth a few dollars — Apple collects a commission. That single transaction sits at the heart of a legal battle that could reach the US Supreme Court as early as October. Epic Games argues those fees are unjustifiably high and wants Apple to open its books. …
  • Should app store fees be regulated like public utilities, or left to market forces?
AMERICAS · Technology
US offers $10 million for info on group behind Signal and WhatsApp hacking spree
WORLD · Technology
Screen time can damage under-twos’ development, landmark study suggests
ASIA · Technology
South Korean tech giants commit over $550B to ease ‘RAMageddon’
GLOBAL · Technology
The AI jobs debate just got messier
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
1VOCABULARY
effective duopolylevy
steersorely lackingcommission
calculusfriction
2GRAMMAR FOCUS
Inversion with negative adverbials
When a negative or restrictive adverbial (e.g. 'Not only', 'Hardly', 'Never', 'Rarely') is placed at the start of a clause for emphasis, the subject and auxiliary verb are inverted, as in a question structure.
had · did · does · only · rarely · never · hardly · will
  1. Not did Apple face scrutiny in the UK — it also faced a major legal challenge from Epic Games in the US.
  2. Hardly NASA's engineers been asked about the rover modification before they concluded it was technically feasible.
  3. Not only Apple charge commissions of up to 30%, but it also prevents apps from directing users to cheaper alternatives.
  4. Rarely a single market intervention have the potential to affect millions of consumers across so many different apps.
  5. Never before the CMA wielded such powers to formally challenge the dominance of two global technology companies simultaneously.
  6. Hardly the proposal to redirect the Mars rover to the Moon been announced when critics began calling it 'the harvesting of what's left of the Mars program'.
  7. Not does Google face pressure to reduce its fees, but it has already begun implementing the CMA's required changes.
3PHRASAL VERBS
Match the phrasal verb to its definition. All six appear in today's articles.
  1. break open
  2. sign up
  3. pass on (costs)
  4. reach out (implied in 'reaching well beyond')
  5. open up
  6. go to
4CRITICAL THINKING
The CMA's proposed rules target the mechanism of app store fees, but critics wonder whether developers will simply pocket any savings rather than reduce prices for ordinary users. Given that the same concern applies to the Epic vs. Apple case in the US, who is actually being protected here — consumers, corporations, or competition as an abstract principle?
5CREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
6WRITING
A CMA official has argued that forcing transparency around Apple's costs is essential for fair regulation. Write a short paragraph either defending or challenging the idea that a private company should be legally required to open its financial books to a government regulator.
7DEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong using the words below. Arrange them from mild (weakest) to strong (most intense). Words: scrutinised / examined / investigated — friction / obstacle / barrier — concerned / alarmed / outraged — adjust / modify / overhaul — questioned / contested / challenged — lacking / deficient / sorely lacking — redirect / steer / force
  • examined→→
  • friction→→
  • concerned→→
  • adjust→→
  • questioned→→
  • lacking→→
  • redirect→→
8SPEAKING
  1. Who ultimately benefits most if app store commissions fall?
  2. Could Epic Games winning in court hurt smaller developers?
  3. What does 'harvesting' a space programme reveal about priorities?
  4. Is transparency about costs enough to rebuild trust in tech giants?
  5. Which matters more: beating China to the Moon or reaching Mars?