theSIGNAL SCIENCE
14 June 2026
"The universe is not only stranger than we imagine; it is stranger than we can imagine."
Science

Universe Still Speeding Up — Crisis Averted

A fierce debate over dark energy's existence has ended, and the cosmos is still doing exactly what physicists thought it was.

Picture the universe as a loaf of bread rising in an oven — except no one switched the oven on, and the bread keeps rising faster and faster all by itself. That is roughly the puzzle cosmologists have wrestled with since 1998, when three astrophysicists discovered that the universe's expansion is not slowing down but accelerating. That discovery won Adam Riess, Brian Schmidt, and Saul Perlmutter the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics. Then, in late 2025, a rival team shook the field by claiming the evidence for that acceleration — and for the mysterious force called dark energy behind it — was falling apart.

The challenge was serious. The rival researchers argued that the standard method of measuring cosmic expansion using Type Ia supernovae, the brilliant, predictable explosions that mark the deaths of certain stars, was fundamentally flawed. If they were right, nearly 30 years of cosmological research would have needed to be thrown out. Physicists on several continents held their breath.

Had one of the most celebrated discoveries in modern science been built on a mistake?

Photo: NASA Hubble Space Telescope / Unsplash
A supernova explosion lights up its host galaxy, the cosmic ruler astronomers use to measure universal expansion.
Discuss
  • What does it mean to say the universe's expansion is 'accelerating', and why does it matter?
  • Why do scientists use supernovae as a tool for measuring distances across the universe?
  • How should the scientific community respond when a major discovery is publicly challenged?
  • Is it a sign of strength or weakness that a Nobel Prize-winning result had to be retested?
  • If dark energy cannot yet be explained, should we still be confident it exists?
Science

Where Is Everybody? A Cosmic New Answer

In 1950, Enrico Fermi paused over lunch at Los Alamos and asked a deceptively simple question: "Where is everybody?" He meant aliens — and nobody has satisfactorily answered him since. Now, Columbia University's Professor David Kipping has added a thrilling twist. …
  • If cosmic expansion limits alien contact, does that make humanity permanently, cosmically alone?
∞
By proving our measurements are correct, we can get back to trying to understand what dark energy actually is, rather than wondering if it exists at all.
Dr Phil Wiseman, Lead Author, University of Southampton
Science

Meet Lucy's Hunter: A New Crocodile

Three million years ago, something enormous was waiting in the rivers of what is now Ethiopia. It was watching Lucy. A University of Iowa-led team has formally identified that lurking predator as a previously unknown species, naming it *Crocodylus lucivenator* — meaning "Lucy's hunter." …
  • Does naming a predator after Lucy change how you think about early human survival?
AMERICAS · Science
SpaceX heads for record $1.78tn float amid fears it is overvalued
WORLD · Science
Ancient DNA shared with Neanderthals may explain human language
AMERICAS · Science
Faster biological aging consistently linked to poverty and discrimination
ASIA · Science
Giant underground neutrino detector brings scientists closer to cracking the neutrino puzzle
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
1VOCABULARY
painstaking careacceleration
fundamentally flawedcalibrateddeceptively simple
ecosystemlurking
2GRAMMAR FOCUS
Cleft sentences — It was X that / What + clause + is/was
Cleft sentences split one idea into two clauses to give special emphasis. 'It was X that...' highlights a particular element, while 'What...' clauses emphasise what is most important or surprising.
It was · What · that · who · remains · discovered · shook
  1. Riess, Schmidt, and Perlmutter ___ first proved the universe's expansion was accelerating.
  2. the rival team claimed was that the supernova method was fundamentally flawed.
  3. It was the University of Southampton team re-examined the supernova data with painstaking care.
  4. truly ___ one of the grandest unsolved mysteries in science is the nature of dark energy.
  5. It was in 1950 Enrico Fermi first posed his famous question about alien civilisations.
  6. a rival team ___ the field in late 2025 by challenging decades of cosmological research.
  7. It was a prominent hump on its snout made Crocodylus lucivenator unlike any modern crocodile.
3COLLOCATIONS
Match the verb on the left with the noun phrase it best collocates with on the right.
  1. shake
  2. account for
  3. calibrate
  4. clear
  5. fold into
  6. outrank
4CRITICAL THINKING
All three articles describe scientists working at the edge of what is currently knowable — dark energy, alien civilisations, and prehistoric ecosystems. What do these stories share in terms of how knowledge advances, and what does each reveal about the role of uncertainty in scientific progress?
5CREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
6WRITING
The Southampton team's findings suggest that a misreading of data, rather than faulty data itself, caused the controversy. Write a short opinion piece arguing why scientific literacy — the ability to interpret evidence correctly — matters as much as scientific discovery.
7DEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • unusual→→
  • looked at→→
  • error→→
  • large→→
  • worried→→
  • famous→→
  • unclear→→
8SPEAKING
  1. Which finding excites you more: dark energy confirmed or Crocodylus lucivenator discovered?
  2. Should ancient predators ever be named after the prey they hunted?
  3. How much should a single research team's reanalysis shift scientific consensus?
  4. Could the Fermi paradox ever be definitively solved, or not?
  5. What responsibility do scientists have when their work contradicts Nobel-winning research?