theSIGNAL CULTURE
16 October 2026
"The unexamined life is not worth living."
Culture
Photo: Glenn Carstens-Peters / Unsplash
A viewer watches a live news broadcast on a laptop screen, reflecting the shift from television to streaming platforms.

The BBC Follows Its Audience to YouTube

On a Thursday, the old ritual of settling before the evening news quietly acquired a new address: YouTube, where the BBC's rolling channel now streams live to Britain and America, having already reached Nairobi, Lagos, Warsaw and Sydney. Officials call it a defence against disinformation, though it also reassures politicians weighing the licence fee's future. If trust must now travel to wherever attention lives, who decides where it settles?
  • Should public broadcasters go to where audiences are, or make audiences come to them?
Culture
Photo: Brands&People / Unsplash
A young film-maker prepares to shoot a scene on a dimly lit set.

The Director Behind Two Oscar Whispers

At thirty, Florida-born Lance Oppenheim has two films circulating in awards season: Primetime, in which Robert Pattinson plays Chris Hansen, the television inquisitor of To Catch a Predator, and a secretive three-hour documentary made with Nathan Fielder, living beside Elizabeth Holmes before her prison term. Both films share an eerie fascination with performance. Oppenheim calls Hansen's show "an alien object beamed in from Mars", where pizza, cookies and a kitchen island became the props of public shaming.
  • When television stages justice as theatre, who is really performing, and who is watching?
"
He was just dark and arrogant and performing, he was scary, he was demanding.
Complainant, giving evidence at Southwark Crown Court
Culture

The Persona on Trial: Brand and the Jury Room

At Southwark Crown Court, a jury is weighing not only allegations against Russell Brand but also the question of which version of a performer to believe.

In courtroom number one at Southwark Crown Court, a television screen is angled toward the dock, and on Thursday a man who has spent a quarter of a century being watched sat watching someone else. Russell Brand, 51, followed a recorded police interview almost without blinking, rarely shifting in his seat, while a woman's voice, captured in 2023, described an evening that she says began in friendly ease and ended in something she could scarcely name at the time. Brand denies all seven charges against him: three counts of rape, three of sexual assault and one of indecent assault, brought on the testimony of six women and covering the years between 1999 and 2009. The complainant in this part of the trial, whose identity is protected, told the jury that she met Brand before he was famous, at the Labour Party conference in Bournemouth in 1999.

She said she took him for gay, camp and harmless, and so did not feel he was pursuing her. Back in a hotel room, she alleged, the tone changed. She described a man prancing about in his underwear, asking her to photograph him shirtless, and then becoming someone else entirely. Prosecutors showed the jury those photographs.

She also told police that she had doubted, at first, whether to call what followed rape, because it had felt so ordinary, a hesitation familiar to many who report such accusations years later. It is her description of a transformation that lingers, because it touches the strange economy of celebrity. Brand built his career on theatrical excess, on a persona so elastic that audiences from London to Los Angeles learned never to ask where the costume ended. The woman told the court he was suddenly the centre of the show, as if back on stage, and no longer the person she had been chatting to.

Photo: Haseeb Jamil / Unsplash
Southwark Crown Court in London, where the jury is hearing evidence against the comedian and actor.
Discuss
  • Why might a witness doubt whether an experience was rape at the time, yet report it years later?
  • How does a performer's public persona complicate a jury's task of judging private behaviour?
  • What does the presumption of innocence require of newspapers reporting on a trial still in progress?
ASIA · Culture
‘I must continue until I die’: inside the fight to bring Iran’s thriving art scene to the world
AMERICAS · Culture
Ex-gang boss sentenced to 40 years for orchestrating Tupac Shakur's murder
EUROPE · Culture
They asked for 80 homes – she gave them 157! Council-housing miracle named Britain’s best new building
AFRICA · Culture
Zimbabwean author denies using AI to write award-winning story
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
iVOCABULARY
dockpresumption of innocence
complainantcamppersona
elasticdisinformation
iiGRAMMAR FOCUS
Participle clauses — present (-ing) and past (-ed)
A present participle (-ing) clause gives an active meaning and shows what the subject does or was doing, while a past participle (-ed) clause gives a passive meaning, describing what has been done to the subject. Both let you combine two ideas in one sentence without a conjunction.
describing · watching · protected · brought · streaming · captured · built
  1. a recorded police interview on a screen, Russell Brand barely moved in his seat.
  2. The woman, whose identity is by the court, gave evidence to the jury.
  3. The charges, on the testimony of six women, cover the years between 1999 and 2009.
  4. the hotel room, the complainant said the man's tone changed suddenly.
  5. Her voice, in a police interview in 2023, was played to the jury.
  6. Brand, having his career on theatrical excess, is now facing very different scrutiny.
iiiDEPENDENT PREPOSITIONS
Complete each phrase with the correct preposition. All from today’s articles.
  1. Brand denies all seven charges brought ___ the testimony of six women.
  2. She said she took him ___ gay, camp and harmless.
  3. The jury must decide what happened, and the presumption of innocence stands ___ they do.
  4. The trial raises an unsettling question ___ how a public self is performed for decades.
  5. She hesitated ___ whether to call what followed rape, because it had felt so ordinary.
ivCRITICAL THINKING
The BBC argues that streaming on YouTube helps it compete with disinformation, yet it also hands a private American platform a gatekeeping role over public-service news. Who gains most from this arrangement, and what might a public broadcaster risk by depending on a platform it does not control? Consider too whether Oppenheim's interest in figures who 'perform' justice or innocence says something about why audiences find such stories so compelling.
vCREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
viWRITING
Imagine you are a juror told to set aside everything you know about a celebrity's public image. In 100-150 words, describe in the first person how you would try to do this, and what you think would be hardest.
viiDEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • unsettling→→
  • eccentric→→
  • hesitate→→
  • watch→→
  • embarrass→→
  • worry→→
viiiSPEAKING
  1. Is it ever possible to separate an artist's work from their behaviour?
  2. Does a long trial in the public eye make a fair verdict harder?
  3. Which is more dangerous: disinformation online, or declining trust in traditional news?
  4. Why do audiences enjoy watching ordinary people being publicly exposed or shamed?