theSIGNAL TECHNOLOGY
5 November 2026
"Power is not only the ability to act, but the ability to be believed."
Photo: SpaceX / Unsplash
Rocket on a launch pad at dusk, symbolising SpaceX's reliance on government contracts and political goodwill
💸
$450m
Musk's spending backing Republicans, a US election-cycle record
Discuss
  • Should individuals be allowed to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on elections? Where would you draw the line, if anywhere?
  • Why might voters in both parties oppose data centres even while using AI tools every day?
Technology

Musk's $450m Bet Lost: What Now for SpaceX?

The world's biggest political spender backed Republicans with record sums, yet Democrats won decisively, leaving his companies exposed to scrutiny and new regulation.

Almost $450m is more than anyone has ever spent in a single US election cycle, and Elon Musk spent it almost entirely on one side. On Tuesday night, the result was clear: Democrats won the midterms convincingly, and the world's richest man had little to show for his money. The most striking defeat came in Texas, where Democrat James Talarico beat Republican Ken Paxton for a Senate seat. A BBC analysis of campaign finance records found that Musk had put at least $45m behind Paxton.

He also spent heavily in Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota, and the filings suggest the money kept flowing until Monday. By Tuesday night, Musk appeared to concede, joking on X that his election-interfering space lasers had not worked. The joke may hide a real problem. SpaceX is estimated to have won around $10bn in new government contracts since Donald Trump returned to the White House, and several Democratic lawmakers have said its growing role in national security deserves investigation.

With the balance of power shifting, such calls may now carry more weight than they did a week ago. There is a quieter threat, too. Data centres, the vast buildings that house the computing hardware behind ChatGPT, Claude, X and Musk's AI company xAI, were themselves on the ballot. In Georgia, where SpaceX operates data centres, the newly elected Democratic governor campaigned partly on curbing their spread and the tax breaks that attract them.

//
Musk joked on X that his election-interfering space lasers did not work.
Elon Musk, owner of X and chief executive of SpaceX
Technology

Suspected Kremlin Hackers Hunted for Diplomats

Embassies rarely announce that they have been watched, yet researchers now suspect a hacking group was searching for diplomatic targets. They believe it may have been sponsored by the Kremlin, although attribution in cyberspace is notoriously uncertain. The significance lies in the choice of victims. Diplomats carry quiet knowledge, from negotiating positions to private assessments, which is why states from Asia to Europe have long treated their communications as prime intelligence prizes.…
  • Should governments publicly name states they suspect of hacking diplomats, even without conclusive proof?
Technology

OpenAI Invokes the New Deal for 2028

Chris Lehane, OpenAI's chief global affairs officer, wants the 2028 US election to become a referendum on artificial intelligence, and he reaches for Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal to explain why. His essay urges politicians to offer anxious voters a "third path" and lists five priorities. Critics, however, note that the original New Deal restrained corporate power.…
  • Can a company fairly propose rules for the industry that profits from them?
GLOBAL · Technology
Binance says fake job interviews used as part of $6.3bn crypto hack
ASIA · Technology
North Korea linked to massive Binance crypto heist
EUROPE · Technology
Ukraine’s new pocket-sized gadget turns Russian drones’ cameras against them
AMERICAS · Technology
It’s time to block reckless AI IPOs and tax billionaires | Naomi Klein and Ilana Glazer
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
1VOCABULARY
concedecampaign finance
ahistoricalattributioncurbing
referendumconsent
2GRAMMAR FOCUS
Causative have/get — have something done
Use have (or the more informal get) + object + past participle to say that someone arranges for another person to do something for them, or that something unwelcome happens to them. For example: 'She had her phone hacked' or 'They got the report checked by lawyers.'
had · have · got · having · getting · investigated · hacked
  1. Several Democratic lawmakers want SpaceX's growing role in national security to investigated.
  2. After the midterms, Elon Musk might wish he had his campaign strategy reviewed by independent advisers.
  3. The researchers believe the embassy had its communications by a suspected Kremlin-sponsored group.
  4. Journalists the campaign finance records analysed by experts before publishing their findings.
  5. Diplomats are advised to their devices checked regularly for signs of spyware.
  6. OpenAI's critics argue that the company its political essay polished by public relations experts before releasing it.
3PHRASAL VERBS
Match the phrasal verb to its definition. All six appear in today’s articles.
  1. to accept that you have lost or been defeated ("Musk appeared to ___ ...")
  2. to hide or cover something so that it is not easily noticed ("The joke may ___ a real problem.")
  3. to continue to be supplied or to move steadily ("the money kept ___ until Monday")
  4. to buy something back, or to regain something you had lost ("Can any amount of political money ___ back their consent?")
  5. to refer to something as a way of supporting an argument ("he ___ for Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal")
4CRITICAL THINKING
Musk's money failed in Texas, yet the articles suggest his bigger risks may be investigations, contracts and local opposition to data centres. What kinds of influence are harder to measure than election spending, and who is best placed to hold the powerful accountable for them? Consider also whether suspicion about a hacking group's backers, as in the Kremlin story, should change how we judge claims we cannot fully verify.
5CREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
6WRITING
Imagine you are an adviser to a tech billionaire who has just watched a very costly political gamble fail. Write a short memo (120-150 words) recommending what he should do next, and explain which risk you consider most serious.
7DEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • a setback→→
  • worried→→
  • a concern→→
  • questionable→→
  • a change→→
  • unlikely→→
8SPEAKING
  1. Which is more dangerous for democracy: rich donors or biased media? Why?
  2. Would you accept a data centre near your home if it created jobs?
  3. Do you think secrets between countries are ever justified? Give an example.
  4. Is it fair for a company to take credit for helping the economy?