Ask two of the world's most advanced AI models the same blunt question about American elections, and they will almost never agree. In a new study, SpaceXAI's Grok 4.7 recommended the Republican candidate in 92% of its answers. OpenAI's GPT-6.
1 Sol chose the Democrat in 97%. Across nearly 500 races in this year's midterms, the two models reached the same verdict less than one time in ten. The researchers, at the conversational AI studio Convovo, led by Cornell University professor Tapan Parikh, used a deliberately forceful prompt. Through the models' APIs, the technical channels developers use to build their own products, they asked who to vote for and told the systems not to hedge or list both sides.
The consumer apps, ChatGPT and Grok, refused to answer. An OpenAI spokesperson argued this was the significant finding, since that is how most people meet the technology, and said the API test does not reflect ordinary use. SpaceXAI did not respond in time to comment. Parikh accepts the distinction, yet he notes that simple prompts were enough to jailbreak the apps into making recommendations that largely matched his results.
The deeper point, he argues, lies elsewhere. The models carry what he calls an implicit set of values that shapes which issues they treat as important, and which terms they search for, before they reach any conclusion.