theSIGNAL SCIENCE
5 October 2026
"The dead do not bury themselves; the living decide how they are remembered."
Science

Skulls Reveal Egypt's Oldest Royal Sacrifices

New forensic analysis of skulls buried near First Dynasty kings suggests dozens of royal attendants were killed, not left to die naturally, over 5,000 years ago.

Picture a graveyard in the desert at Abydos, Egypt, roughly 3000 B.C. Dozens of simple chambers line up in neat rows, surrounding the tomb of a king. Inside each chamber lies a single person, sometimes with a coffin, sometimes with a few ceramic pots or an ivory figurine.

When the British archaeologist Flinders Petrie first dug here in the 1920s, he counted too many deaths occurring too close together to be a coincidence. Yet he could find no wounds on the bones. The mystery was filed away, half-solved, for a century. Now it has been reopened.

Dr. Roselyn Campbell of Purdue University led a reexamination of a sample of these skulls using forensic techniques unavailable to Petrie, methods originally developed to investigate modern crime scenes. What she found was striking: at least 39% of the individuals studied show cranial trauma severe enough to have been fatal. That is a remarkably high proportion for people supposedly buried around the same time as their king, and it strongly supports the theory of retainer sacrifice, in which attendants are killed to serve a ruler in the afterlife.

What makes the discovery unsettling is not just the violence, but the silence surrounding it.

Photo: Hulki Okan Tabak / Unsplash
Rows of ancient burial chambers surround a First Dynasty royal tomb at Abydos, Egypt.
Discuss
  • Why might ancient societies have believed rulers needed attendants in the afterlife?
  • How should historians treat individuals who appear only as footnotes to royalty?
  • What ethical questions arise when modern forensics are applied to ancient human remains?
Science

Your Gut Microbes May Age Your Brain

Could a brain grow old before its time, even in someone young and healthy? UCLA researchers scanned nearly 1,500 adults, from Los Angeles to collaborating sites abroad, and built a "Brain Aging Index" comparing estimated versus actual brain age. Older-looking brains correlated with weaker memory, slower focus, and more depressive symptoms. The surprising twist? Stool samples revealed links to specific gut bacteria and byproducts—certain fats, a cholesterol-related molecule, and low estetrol—tied to immune and vascular pathways.…
  • Could altering gut bacteria actually slow measurable brain aging in humans?
∞
Who were these people and how did they view the ruler and their own role in his or her life and death?
Dr. Roselyn Campbell, Purdue University
Science

The Antarctic Basin No Scientist Has Seen

No ship has ever sailed within 150 kilometers of Cook Glacier's front. That single fact says everything about East Antarctica's Wilkes Subglacial Basin, a region holding enough ice to lift global sea levels by up to four meters. Led by Matt King at the University of Tasmania, researchers from 14 countries have now reviewed what little is known. Geological clues suggest the basin retreated dramatically during past warm spells. Yet the seafloor remains unmapped, ocean conditions largely guessed at.…
  • Why has this high-risk Antarctic region remained unexplored for so long?
AMERICAS · Science
Scientists find an “earthquake gate” as California fault stress hits a 1,000-year high
OCEANIA · Science
Today's emissions choices could limit Antarctic ice loss and sea-level rise for coastal communities
WORLD · Science
Thursday briefing: The long, long wait for a male contraceptive pill may soon be over
EUROPE · Science
ESA’s Juice just used Earth as a slingshot to Jupiter
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
1VOCABULARY
cranial traumaretainer sacrifice
state-sanctioned violenceivory figurineBrain Aging Index
subglacial basinforensic techniques
2GRAMMAR FOCUS
Modal verbs — deduction and speculation (must have, cannot have, might have)
Use 'must have + past participle' for strong certainty, 'cannot have + past participle' for strong negative certainty, and 'might have + past participle' for possibility about the past.
must have · cannot have · might have · could have · can't have
  1. With over 39% showing fatal skull injuries, the attendants been killed deliberately rather than dying of natural causes.
  2. Petrie found no wounds on the bones, so he reasonably assumed the deaths been violent, though he was wrong.
  3. The attendants believed their sacrifice was an honor, but we simply cannot be sure given the limited evidence.
  4. Given how high the proportion of injuries was, the timing of the burials been a mere coincidence.
  5. Since the gut bacteria are linked to immune pathways, certain byproducts influenced brain aging in the UCLA study.
  6. Because no ship has ever sailed near the glacier, scientists mapped the seafloor using direct observation.
3PHRASAL VERBS
Match the phrasal verb to its definition. All six appear in today’s articles.
  1. file away
  2. dig here
  3. line up
  4. sweep along
  5. bind up with
4CRITICAL THINKING
All three articles involve scientists making confident claims from incomplete evidence—fractured skulls, stool samples, and unmapped seafloors. At what point does a scientific interpretation become a story we want to believe, rather than one the evidence fully supports?
5CREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
6WRITING
Imagine you are one of the attendants buried near the king at Abydos. Write a short diary entry from the night before your death, written for someone centuries in the future to find.
7DEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • odd→→
  • upset→→
  • hurt→→
  • guess→→
  • slow→→
  • unclear→→
8SPEAKING
  1. Should forensic science rewrite history books, or just footnotes?
  2. Do gut bacteria studies worry or reassure you personally?
  3. Is unexplored territory on Earth exciting or frightening now?
  4. Which of these three mysteries intrigues you most, and why?