theSIGNAL ENVIRONMENT
6 July 2026
"Nature is not a problem to be solved but a condition to be respected."
Environment

Geoengineering's Long, Reckless Prehistory Returns to Haunt Us

From draining the Mediterranean to melting the Arctic, humanity's urge to rewire the planet's climate is far older — and far stranger — than today's headlines suggest.

In the 1930s, a German engineer named Herman Sörgel drew up blueprints to dam the Strait of Gibraltar, drain the Mediterranean by two hundred metres, and create a continent-scale agricultural zone to be worked by African labourers. The plan, which he called Atlantropa, attracted serious attention from leading engineers and survived, remarkably, into the 1960s — outlasting the very world war that had made its colonial logic grotesque. It is a useful place to begin any honest accounting of geoengineering, because it shows that the impulse to remake the planet is not a product of the climate crisis. It is something older and stranger in the human character.

That impulse also flourished in the Soviet Union. The engineer P.M. Borisov proposed building a dam across the Bering Strait to melt the Arctic ice cap and warm a country that, as the American climatologist P.

E. Lydolph once observed, simply "lacks heat." Rival Soviet scientists argued the same warming could be achieved more efficiently by excavating roughly 3,000 square kilometres of sea floor along the Wyville-Thomson Ridge — an intervention they apparently considered modest. Both proposals reflected a post-war ideology that treated nature as an engineering problem waiting for a sufficiently bold solution.

Photo: Chris LeBoutillier / Unsplash
A cloudless sky over industrial infrastructure, where human ambition and atmospheric risk converge daily.
Discuss
  • Why did Herman Sörgel's Atlantropa plan survive into the 1960s despite its obvious ethical problems?
  • What does the Soviet plan to dam the Bering Strait reveal about how ideology shapes environmental thinking?
  • Is there a meaningful moral difference between geoengineering driven by ambition and geoengineering driven by desperation?
  • Should governments be allowed to approve geoengineering experiments that could affect the climate of other countries?
  • How should scientists communicate the risks of geoengineering to the public without causing either panic or false hope?
Environment

Thailand's Unstoppable Invasive Fish

In Samut Songkhram, south of Bangkok, fisher Wallop Khunjaen watched blackchin tilapia devour nearly one million baby shrimp from his pond within two months — forcing him to abandon the trade entirely. Native to West Africa, the species was first recorded spreading in Thailand in 2011. …
  • Can turning an invasive species into food ever realistically control its population?
Environment

Europe's AC Debate Heats Up Fast

When temperatures in eastern Brandenburg hit 41.7°C on a recent Sunday, retired handyman Mario, 65, stayed calm — partly because he belongs to the rare 6% of Germans who own a fixed air-conditioning unit. …
  • Should governments prioritise air conditioning or long-term cooling infrastructure — and who decides?
"
In general, the country lacks heat.
P.E. Lydolph, climatologist and expert on the geography of the Soviet Union
EUROPE · Environment
Deaths in France surged 30% during hottest week of record June heatwave
AMERICAS · Environment
Birdsong data from Merlin ID app to help global biodiversity project
OCEANIA · Environment
The fight against green ‘waste’: how a Victorian community came together to create garden gold
GLOBAL · Environment
Nominate your invertebrate of the year
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
1VOCABULARY
eradicationmitigation
stratosphericaudacityintervention
grotesqueantiquated
2GRAMMAR FOCUS
Reported speech — statements, questions, commands with tense shift
When reporting what someone said, verbs typically shift back one tense (e.g. 'is' becomes 'was', 'has' becomes 'had'). Reporting verbs such as said, warned, argued, and asked introduce the reported clause.
had reached · was · warned · could be achieved · had devoured · asked · argued · told
  1. Soviet scientists that the same warming could be achieved more efficiently by excavating thousands of square kilometres of sea floor.
  2. The American climatologist P.E. Lydolph once observed that Russia simply a country that lacked heat.
  3. Health experts that mass residential air-conditioning adoption could deepen the very emissions crisis driving temperatures upward.
  4. Fisher Wallop Khunjaen said that the blackchin tilapia nearly one million baby shrimp from his pond within two months.
  5. Rival Soviet engineers that a more modest intervention would produce equivalent results without damming the Bering Strait.
  6. Advocates of geoengineering that conventional mitigation had moved too slowly to prevent catastrophic warming.
  7. Thai authorities fishers to remove the invasive species from waterways, and paid them for every tonne they cleared.
3COLLOCATIONS
Match the verb on the left with the noun phrase it best collocates with on the right.
  1. exhaust
  2. receive
  3. draw up
  4. deepen
  5. treat
  6. prevent
4CRITICAL THINKING
All three articles describe humans attempting to control natural systems — climate, temperature, and ecosystems — with unintended or unforeseen consequences. To what extent does the history of these interventions suggest that the impulse to engineer nature at scale is itself a greater long-term risk than the problems such interventions aim to solve?
5CREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
6WRITING
Some scientists argue that funding geoengineering research actually reduces pressure on governments to cut emissions, while others insist it is the only realistic safety net we have left. Write a short opinion piece arguing one side of this debate, drawing on specific examples from the article.
7DEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • warm→→
  • concerned→→
  • uncommon→→
  • spread→→
  • bold→→
  • harm→→
  • significant→→
8SPEAKING
  1. Which article's problem do you think is most urgent to solve?
  2. Would you personally install AC knowing it worsens emissions?
  3. What role should ordinary citizens play in geoengineering decisions?
  4. Could invasive species management teach us anything about climate intervention?
  5. Which historical lesson from the articles should today's engineers study most?