theSIGNAL CULTURE
7 November 2026
"Every age has its blind spots, and they are rarely visible to those standing inside them."
Culture
Photo: Mario Mendez / Unsplash
Pop singer performing on stage under festive lights, her new Christmas single already drawing comparisons to a 1981 hit

Olivia Rodrigo's Christmas Song Borrows From 1981

When Chris Butler, who wrote The Waitresses' 1981 classic "Christmas Wrapping", received an email from "Olivia Rodrigo", he assumed it was a hoax. After some research, he became a fan, and he replied warmly. Her new single, "Take Me Home (4 Christmas)", echoes his new-wave sound deliberately, though without sampling it, so he receives no credit. He predicts a smash.…
  • Where does honouring an older song end and borrowing from it begin?
Culture
Photo: IONEL LAGAILLARDE / Unsplash
Southwark Crown Court in London, where the comedian was found guilty on Thursday of rape and sexual assault.

After the Verdict, Britain Asks Who Looked Away

A day after Russell Brand was convicted of rape and sexual assault at Southwark Crown Court, London's police chief, Sir Mark Rowley, said more accusers might yet come forward; two further rape investigations are already open. He also said that some trial reporting came "very close to victim blaming". Meanwhile, Prime Minister Andy Burnham, who defended Brand on Twitter in 2014, was left explaining why politicians once courted him.
  • When fame shields powerful men for years, who bears responsibility for not asking questions sooner?
"
Culture

The Rebrand That Cannot Outrun a Verdict

Russell Brand reinvented himself so often that his conviction feels like a final persona, and a reckoning for the culture that applauded him.

For two decades, Russell Brand seemed to possess a talent that few public figures ever master: the ability to shed one skin and slip, almost unnoticed, into another. The provocative stand-up became a television star, then a Hollywood actor, then a YouTuber and political campaigner who, in the 2010s, took up left-wing causes around inequality, later drifted towards Covid conspiracies, and in 2024 declared his support for Donald Trump. That same year he was baptised as a Christian in the waters of the River Thames, a scene staged, like so much of his life, for an audience. On Thursday, however, a jury at Southwark Crown Court in London, after a three-week trial, found him guilty of one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault.

It is a label that no amount of reinvention can easily soften, and as he faces the prospect of prison, attention has turned to an uncomfortable question about where his fame came from. The answer, many critics now argue, is that the very behaviour forming the backdrop to the prosecution was also the engine of his rise. Brand first thrilled audiences as a sexual libertine, an insatiable and shameless womaniser whose act, with its backcombed hair, drainpipe black jeans and graphic stage routines, made excess the central joke. Over the decade of his offending, venues sold out and broadcasters including MTV, Channel 4 and the BBC competed to sign him.

Even his own barrister described the humour as a product of its time, a style once seen as radical. Barely a generation later, much of it looks like misogyny in a comic's costume.

Photo: Colin Lloyd / Unsplash
A courthouse in London, where a jury delivered its verdict after a three-week trial.
Discuss
  • Brand's barrister called his humour a product of its time; does that argument explain anything, or does it excuse too much?
  • Why might audiences and broadcasters have rewarded sexually outrageous comedy so generously during the decade of the offending?
  • How does a public figure's constant reinvention affect the way people judge their character and their credibility?
EUROPE · Culture
‘Children were wearing fake life jackets’: one Syrian family’s terrifying, 10-year journey
AMERICAS · Culture
The Pitt and ER are similar enough for lawsuit to proceed, judge rules
ASIA · Culture
‘He left the world in ruins’: the author who defied the Taliban and burning tyres to tell Alexander the Great’s epic story
WORLD · Culture
Bike from Batman film could sell for £900,000
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
iVOCABULARY
shed one skinlibertine
backdropprosecutionhomage
hoaxvictim blaming
iiGRAMMAR FOCUS
Discourse markers: contrast and concession (Nevertheless, Whereas, Despite, However, Although, In spite of, On the other hand)
Use 'whereas' and 'although' to join two clauses, and 'despite' or 'in spite of' before a noun or -ing form. 'Nevertheless' and 'however' link separate sentences and usually take a comma.
Nevertheless · Whereas · Despite · Although · However · In spite of · On the other hand
  1. his many reinventions over two decades, Russell Brand could not escape the jury's verdict at Southwark Crown Court.
  2. Brand's early fans saw his act as radical, many critics now describe it as misogyny dressed up as comedy.
  3. The trial lasted three weeks; , the jury reached its verdict on Thursday and found him guilty of one count of rape.
  4. his barrister called the humour a product of its time, many viewers find it hard to defend today.
  5. Chris Butler first assumed the email from Olivia Rodrigo was a hoax. , he researched her, became a fan and replied warmly.
  6. The new single echoes the 1981 classic without sampling it. Butler is, , still optimistic that it will be a smash.
iiiIDIOMS
Define each idiom in your own words. Then write one in a sentence of your own.
  1. shed one skin and slip into another (from the first article)
  2. a verdict that cannot be outrun
  3. to compete to sign someone
  4. to look away (from the title of the third article)
  5. to come forward
ivCRITICAL THINKING
The articles suggest that an act once celebrated as 'radical' can later look like 'misogyny in a comic's costume'. Consider who actually profited from this persona: the performer, the broadcasters, the audiences, or the politicians who courted him. Does the passage of time change what we are entitled to blame people for, or only what we are willing to admit?
vCREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
viWRITING
Write a short opinion piece (150-200 words) arguing whether a person's ability to reinvent themselves should make us more or less trusting of them. Draw on at least one example from the articles, and use at least two of the idioms from this sheet.
viiDEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • controversial→→
  • well-known→→
  • uncomfortable→→
  • criticise→→
  • ignore→→
  • change→→
viiiSPEAKING
  1. Which stars from your country reinvented themselves most convincingly, and did you believe it?
  2. Is it fair to blame fans for supporting a celebrity who later disgraces himself?
  3. If an artist's behaviour was an open secret, who should have spoken up?
  4. Would you stop enjoying a favourite comedian's work after a serious conviction? Why?