theSIGNAL BUSINESS
7 November 2026
"Markets are never wrong; opinions often are."
Business

Americans Hate Data Centres More Than Nuclear Plants

A midterm backlash against the buildings that power artificial intelligence has rattled stock markets and raised an uncomfortable question about tech valuations.

In May, Gallup asked Americans a simple question: would you accept a data centre in your community? Some 71% said no. A nuclear power station, a technology many people have feared for decades, drew less hostility, at 53%. That gap, which seemed like a curiosity in spring, now looks like a warning that investors missed.

The midterm elections turned local irritation into national politics. Voters complained about the water and electricity these facilities consume, which many believed would raise household bills, and about noise, land use and general disruption. While President Trump has embraced AI, or "super intelligence" as he calls it, many leading Democrats listened to these complaints. In Texas, James Talarico won a Senate seat in a state long dominated by Republicans, and governor-elect Gina Hinojosa campaigned on a moratorium on new data centres.

Her victory could complicate life for Elon Musk, who has shifted large parts of SpaceX and Tesla to Texas and spent nearly $450m backing Republican candidates. Markets reacted quickly. Share prices fell over the past 24 hours, apparently triggered by the results, although worries about overvalued tech firms predate the vote. Tudor Brown, co-founder of the British chip designer Arm Holdings, reminds us that stock values reflect future earnings, not present ones.

Photo: Sean Pollock / Unsplash
A large data centre complex stands on open land, the kind of site now opposed by local residents.
🏭
71%
of Americans oppose a data centre in their community
Discuss
  • Why might people oppose a data centre more strongly than a nuclear power station in their own community?
  • Stock prices reflect future earnings, not present ones. How does political uncertainty change expectations about the future?
Business

Tech Rout Rolls From Wall Street Worldwide

The Nasdaq's 5.5% plunge on Thursday, its worst day in 19 months, travelled quickly: Tokyo's Nikkei fell 6%, Seoul's Kospi more than 6.5%, and London's FTSE 100 briefly lost 2.35% before closing down 1%. Chip stocks led the damage, with SanDisk down 22%. A strong US jobs report, 165,000 new positions, steadied nerves.…
  • If datacentre spending slows, how much of the AI boom was ever real?
Business

Tesla Retires Cybertruck for Robotaxi Bet

The Cybertruck may end up with a shorter production run than its five-year development phase. Elon Musk said Tesla will wind down output at its Texas factory around mid-2026, freeing space for the driverless Cybercab. The truck's stainless-steel bulk never suited Europe, where pedestrian-safety rules effectively blocked road registration. In the United States, the world's biggest pickup market, an electric powertrain faced loyal petrol-truck buyers.…
  • Does abandoning the Cybertruck signal strategic focus or an admission that Tesla misread buyers?
—
We must protect Americans and establish clear, consistent laws for businesses.
James Talarico, Democratic Senator-elect for Texas
GLOBAL · Business
AI ‘godfather’ Geoffrey Hinton: it might turn out we were better off without AI
ASIA · Business
A Binance engineer thought he was interviewing for a job. Then the hackers pounced
AMERICAS · Business
Paraguay’s president quits after millions of people’s savings frozen in bank crisis
EUROPE · Business
Faisal Islam: How high will interest rates go?
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
IVOCABULARY
hostilitymoratorium
overvaluedfrothrout
plungepivot
IIGRAMMAR FOCUS
Inversion — negative adverbials (Not only did..., Hardly had...)
When a negative or restrictive adverbial (e.g. hardly, not only, no sooner, rarely, under no circumstances) begins a sentence for emphasis, the subject and auxiliary verb are inverted, as in 'Hardly had the results come in when shares began to fall.' Note the pairings: hardly/scarcely + when, no sooner + than, and not only + but also.
Hardly · Not only · No sooner · Rarely · Little · Under no circumstances · Never
  1. had the midterm results been announced when share prices began to slide.
  2. did the Gallup poll reveal strong hostility to data centres, but it also showed they were less popular than nuclear plants.
  3. had the Nasdaq recovered from its plunge than Asian markets suffered heavy losses of their own.
  4. have voters shown such strong feelings about the water and electricity that data centres consume.
  5. did investors realise that local opposition could become a national political issue.
  6. would Gina Hinojosa agree to drop her campaign pledge for a moratorium on new data centres.
IIIIDIOMS
Define each idiom in your own words. Then write one in a sentence of your own.
  1. a wake-up call
  2. to skim the froth off something
  3. to steady nerves
  4. to turn a corner (or: the first crack in the dam / bubble)
  5. to complicate life for someone
IVCRITICAL THINKING
Several voices in these articles interpret the same market fall differently: some see a warning, others a routine adjustment. Whose interpretation do you find most persuasive, and what kind of evidence would you need to decide between them? Consider also who benefits when a story is framed as a 'bubble' rather than a 'correction'.
VCREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
VIWRITING
Imagine a data centre has been proposed on the edge of your town. Write a short letter (150-200 words) to the local council, either supporting or opposing it, using at least two of the concerns or arguments raised in the articles.
VIIDEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • hostile→→
  • irritation→→
  • slip→→
  • worried→→
  • unwise→→
  • adjustment→→
VIIISPEAKING
  1. Who benefits most when a new factory or plant opens near you?
  2. Would you pay higher electricity bills to support AI development?
  3. Is a dramatic stock market crash ever good for ordinary people?
  4. Can voters realistically judge long-term technology risks, or only short-term annoyances?