theSIGNAL CULTURE
27 October 2026
"The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind and still function."
Culture
Photo: IONEL LAGAILLARDE / Unsplash
The Southwark Crown Court building in London, where the trial of the comedian Russell Brand continues this week.

An Assistant's Testimony Enters Brand's London Trial

In a written statement read at Southwark Crown Court, Helen Berger, who worked as Russell Brand's assistant from 2006 to 2007, described being told to collect female fans' phone numbers, a task she found uncomfortable and later refused. She said his behaviour was normalised around him, though she witnessed nothing unlawful. Brand, 51, denies all charges, and his lawyers insist any sexual activity was consensual.…
  • Can celebrity workplaces make questionable behaviour seem normal to the employees who surround it?
Culture
Photo: Bennie Bates / Unsplash
Thousands of fans fill a Dublin arena as Macklemore begins his Free Palestine tour with guests.

Dublin Welcomes the Rapper Dropped From Stadiums

In Dublin's 3Arena, roughly 13,000 people watched Macklemore open a tour born of exile: weeks earlier, after saying "Free Palestine" onstage in New Jersey, he had been removed from Ed Sheeran's stadium run, a decision Sheeran later attributed to his promoter. Hozier, Kneecap and Beoga joined him, while Jewish groups and one stadium owner continue to condemn his words, and proceeds will go to Palestinian causes. Can music ever stay neutral?
  • When an artist's politics clash with a promoter's business, who should decide who performs?
"
I really did feel like I had Jew stamped on my forehead.
Lucie Kon, Oscar-winning executive producer
Culture

The Oscar Winner Who Felt Marked at the BBC

A £400,000 settlement paid to documentary executive Lucie Kon has reopened an uncomfortable debate about belonging, grief and politics inside Britain's best-known broadcaster.

For many years, by her own account, Lucie Kon's religion was the least interesting thing about her at work. She was a commissioning editor at the BBC, a quiet architect of documentaries, and one of the executive producers behind Mr Nobody Against Putin, the film that carried an Oscar into the corporation's trophy cabinet. Then came 7 October 2023, and, she says, the temperature in the building changed. Speaking to The Telegraph, Kon described colleagues who allegedly said that Zionists like her were evil, and another who suggested that anyone calling Hamas terrorists must say the same of Israel.

She had helped to lead a network for Jewish staff and had carried her worries as far as the then director general, Tim Davie. Yet the more she spoke, she told the BBC, the more she became "a problem", a woman with "Jew stamped on my forehead", someone the institution did not know what to do with. Her post was eventually closed in a restructure, and she received about £400,000, which she says covered redundancy back pay and a settlement for personal injury caused by the process. The BBC's position is carefully balanced.

It says it did not uphold any of the antisemitism allegations, but it concedes there were shortcomings in how Kon was treated, and that these affected her personally, without saying what they were. It also stresses that she was a valued colleague of long standing. What lingers is Kon's own verdict, given to LBC, that the BBC is not institutionally antisemitic. The distinction is a fine one, and perhaps the most important in the story: an organisation can reject a charge of prejudice while still failing a person who felt it.

Photo: Thomas Konings / Unsplash
Broadcasting House in London, where Lucie Kon spent many years commissioning documentaries for the corporation.
Discuss
  • The BBC rejected the antisemitism allegations yet admitted shortcomings in its treatment of Kon. How can both statements be true together?
  • Kon says she became 'a problem' after raising concerns. Why might institutions treat people who complain as the difficulty itself?
  • Is it fair to judge a large organisation by individual colleagues' remarks, or only by its formal decisions and policies?
OCEANIA · Culture
Neighbours is being recut into a microdrama focused on Margot Robbie – and her co-stars aren’t happy
AMERICAS · Culture
Spotify uploads lyrics for Dolly Parton's Welsh version of Jolene in Irish
GLOBAL · Culture
Why the charts are full of old songs - and so are your playlists
AMERICAS · Culture
Chris Brown given suspended eight-month prison sentence over nightclub attack
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
iVOCABULARY
commissioning editorallegedly
restructuresettlementshortcomings
institutionallynormalised
iiGRAMMAR FOCUS
Reported speech — statements, questions, commands with tense shift
When we report what someone said, the tense usually moves one step back (is → was, have → had, will → would), pronouns and time words change, and reported questions use statement word order with 'if' or 'whether' for yes/no questions. Reported commands use 'told/asked + object + to-infinitive'.
was · had · would · to · if · whether · had been
  1. Kon told The Telegraph that her religion the least interesting thing about her at work for many years.
  2. She said that after 7 October the temperature in the building changed.
  3. Kon claimed that one colleague had said that anyone who called Hamas terrorists say the same of Israel.
  4. The BBC said it not upheld any of the antisemitism allegations.
  5. Kon explained that she told she had become 'a problem' because she kept speaking up.
  6. In her statement, Berger said that Brand told her to collect female fans' phone numbers.
iiiIDIOMS
Define each idiom in your own words. Then write one in a sentence of your own.
  1. the temperature in the building changed
  2. to carry something as far as (a person or level)
  3. a fine line / a fine distinction
  4. to have something stamped on your forehead
  5. to bend (a place or situation) until something looks ordinary
ivCRITICAL THINKING
Both stories turn on how much weight we should give to people's accounts of their own experience when the surrounding evidence is incomplete or disputed. What kinds of evidence would you want before deciding whether a workplace treated someone unfairly, and is it ever reasonable to reach a judgement when only one side has spoken publicly? Consider also how the passage of time, as in the 2006-2007 testimony, affects how reliable and how persuasive such accounts feel.
vCREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
viWRITING
Imagine you are an HR manager asked to draft a short, practical guide for staff on how to raise a serious concern at work and what they can expect to happen next. Write the opening paragraph, drawing on what these stories suggest about trust, listening and the gap between a formal outcome and how people feel.
viiDEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • uneasy→→
  • a shortcoming→→
  • disagree with→→
  • a remark→→
  • awkward→→
  • overlook→→
viiiSPEAKING
  1. How might a shared workplace network help or harm employees with concerns?
  2. Should settlements be kept confidential, or should the public know the details?
  3. Is silence from an institution ever more damaging than a bad decision?
  4. Would you refuse an uncomfortable task from a famous boss, as Berger did?