theSIGNAL CULTURE
30 September 2026
"A film that congratulates itself rarely leaves room for the audience to think."
Culture
Photo: Caught In Joy / Unsplash
Prince performing during his prolific mid-1980s creative period in the studio

The Restless Genius Behind Sign o' the Times

In 1987, Prince nearly released a triple album; his label balked, and what emerged instead was Sign o' the Times, an 80-minute sprawl of funk, gospel and heartbreak. A new book by John McKie, drawn from over 100 interviews, shows an artist who revealed almost nothing in person yet everything in sound—firing his band, ending an engagement, then singing both desire and doubt within the same breath. Forty years on, Minneapolis's most private star still speaks loudest through the music itself.
  • Why did Prince reveal so little about himself outside his music?
  • What does Sign o' the Times say about creative transition and loss?
  • Can an artist's contradictions become their defining strength?
Environment
Photo: Mathieu Deslauriers / Unsplash
Cleared tropical forest land shows the scale of global deforestation losses.

UN Warns Forest Recovery Window Is Closing

Since 1990, an area larger than South Africa—489 million hectares of forest—has vanished from the planet, the United Nations reports, with even more land left degraded rather than destroyed outright. Governments from Brazil to Indonesia have pledged to restore over a billion hectares, yet barely a fifth of that promise is being kept, the FAO finds, even as wildfires now scorch 127 million hectares annually. Restoring that missing billion hectares could yield $1.8tn a year, the agency says.…
  • Which nations should bear the greatest cost of forest restoration?
"
Its imminent landfall is going to be like a nuclear attack.
Ganesh, chief scientist, played by Riz Ahmed
Culture

Iñárritu's Arctic Satire Melts Under Its Own Ambition

The Oscar-winning director's new film pairs a bald, Stetson-wearing Tom Cruise with a runaway Arctic ice floe, and somehow still falls flat.

There is a particular disappointment reserved for films that arrive trailing prestige, and this is one of them. Alejandro González Iñárritu, the Mexican director who has already collected two Best Director Oscars, in Los Angeles, for "Birdman" and "The Revenant", returns with a satire that is meant to skewer American power and appetite, yet spends most of its running time admiring its own reflection instead. At its centre is Tom Cruise, transformed almost unrecognisably into "Digger" Rockwell, a paunchy, balding Texan oil baron first seen fussing over his incontinent cat before turning his attention to a crisis at his Arctic drilling site. His prized possession, a battered shovel once used by his grandfather in the same Texas oil fields a century earlier, becomes a prop he waves whenever he wants to make a point.

It is a performance built from prosthetics and drawl, and while it has flashes of energy, it rarely convinces. The plot turns on a warning delivered by Ganesh, the company's anxious chief scientist, played by Riz Ahmed, who reveals that reckless drilling has broken off an ice floe several times the size of Manhattan, now drifting toward Norway with the force of an incoming attack. What follows, a White House crisis meeting with an ailing president played by John Goodman, should crackle with tension; instead, it drags, wasting fine actors, including Sandra Hüller, in underwritten roles. What lingers afterward, oddly, is not the satire but the imagery: cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki and production designer Dennis Gassner conjure a genuinely eerie, bulging vision of a frozen world in collapse.

The spectacle survives.

Photo: NOAA / Unsplash
A Texan oil tycoon confronts a drifting Arctic ice floe in Iñárritu's new satire.
Discuss
  • Can visual spectacle redeem a film whose satire feels shallow or self-congratulatory?
EUROPE · Culture
Liam Neeson involved in new movie revealing story behind Tuam babies
AMERICAS · Culture
‘A couple of times people walked out’: how an Anne Frank musical became the hottest theater ticket of the year
GLOBAL · Culture
News media must stay relevant or 'society will struggle', says World News Day organiser
WORLD · Culture
Michael Sheen says being an actor will be a disadvantage on Celebrity Traitors
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
iVOCABULARY
skewerpaunchy
prized possessionice floeunderwritten roles
sprawlscorch
iiGRAMMAR FOCUS
Participle clauses — present (-ing) and past (-ed)
Use an -ing clause when the noun performs the action (active meaning) and an -ed clause when the noun receives the action (passive meaning). These clauses often replace relative clauses to make writing more concise.
drawing · played · drifting · broken · reveals · wasting · drawn
  1. from over 100 interviews, McKie's book reveals a very private artist.
  2. The ice floe, toward Norway, is several times the size of Manhattan.
  3. The White House meeting, by an ailing president, fails to generate real tension.
  4. The drilling accident off a massive ice floe from the Arctic shelf.
  5. The film keeps fine actors like Sandra Hüller in thin, underwritten roles.
  6. Ganesh, in the film by Riz Ahmed, warns of an looming disaster.
iiiCOLLOCATIONS
Match the verb on the left with the noun phrase it best collocates with on the right.
  1. collect
  2. skewer
  3. break off
  4. crackle with
  5. waste
ivCRITICAL THINKING
The film's cinematography is praised even as its satire is judged to fail. Can a film be considered a success or failure as a whole, or must spectacle and message be judged separately? Use evidence from the review to support your view.
vCREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
viWRITING
Imagine you are Riz Ahmed's character, Ganesh, writing a private diary entry after the White House crisis meeting fails to produce action. Describe your frustration and fears in 4-5 sentences.
viiDEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • disappointed→→
  • concerning→→
  • unusual→→
  • reluctant→→
  • private→→
  • damaged→→
viiiSPEAKING
  1. Should critics judge prestige directors more harshly than newcomers?
  2. Is it fair to hide behind heavy prosthetics and makeup?
  3. Does firing collaborators ever justify producing better art?
  4. Should broken promises on restoration carry real financial penalties?