theSIGNAL CULTURE
20 September 2026
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."
Culture
Photo: Sam McGhee / Unsplash
Rachel Eliza Griffiths and Salman Rushdie have told their story through memoirs and now film.

The Camera That Came Back to Life

On an August morning in 2022, Rachel Eliza Griffiths answered a panicked phone call that would shatter the quiet of her New York home: her husband, Sir Salman Rushdie, had been stabbed on stage at a literary event nearly 400 miles away. Within days of chartering a plane to his bedside, not knowing whether he would survive, she had ordered a proper camera — and wept when the box arrived, feeling her identity as an artist being handed back to her. Both have since published memoirs about the attack: Rushdie's *Knife* in 2024 and Griffiths' *The Flower Bearers* this year.…
  • Can art-making genuinely heal trauma, or does it risk turning suffering into spectacle?
Environment
Photo: Chris Gallagher / Unsplash
Floodwaters submerge streets in Bangladesh during Asia's devastating summer of extreme rainfall.

Europe's Hottest Summer, Meekest Response

Ursula von der Leyen called it the "summer of truth" — a season that killed roughly 35,000 people across Europe, scorched harvests, emptied reservoirs, and left a damage bill estimated at €180 billion, with more still to arrive. Science, she warned, is unambiguous: Europe is warming at double the global rate, and this record-breaking heat is probably the coolest such summer the continent will ever know again. Yet across Asia, extreme rainfall and typhoons displaced hundreds of thousands, while drought gripped 60% of the United States — a figure without precedent for that time of year. The political response has drawn sharp criticism.…
  • Can political institutions ever respond to climate change quickly enough?
"
Outside Szor's parents' house in central Israel, protesters called for the "death penalty for traitors."
Demonstrators reported by The Guardian, Venice, 2025
Culture

Venice Stands for 25 Minutes as Gaza Film Ignites Fury

A documentary told entirely in Hebrew by Israeli military insiders has divided audiences between awe and outrage, from the Lido to Tel Aviv.

For a full twenty-five minutes after the final frame dissolved, the audience inside Venice's Sala Grande did not sit down. They turned, instead, toward the film-makers — two young Israelis standing somewhere in the gilded dark of the Palazzo del Cinema — and they applauded. The film that had preceded this extraordinary silence was NAZA, an eighty-minute documentary produced by The Guardian, whose very title is drawn from an Israeli military acronym used as a bureaucratic euphemism for the civilians whose deaths are calculated and anticipated before a strike is ever ordered. What makes the film so difficult to dismiss, and so impossible to contain, is that it is narrated entirely in Hebrew by twenty-four anonymised insiders from some of the Israeli military's most elite units.

Intelligence officers and soldiers describe, with remarkable candour and wildly varying registers of remorse, a set of systems — several of them powered by artificial intelligence — that are used to select thousands of targets for strikes, most of them carried out at night and in the midst of family homes. Some of those who speak seem broken by what they describe. Others recall it with something closer to excitement, even pleasure. All roads, however, lead to the same destination: a programme of killing in which the boundary between combatant and civilian had largely ceased to exist, in a war that has now claimed more than 73,000 Palestinian lives.

In New York, where the film is due to open in cinemas from 30 September, anticipation has been building steadily. But in Israel, the reaction has been of an entirely different order. The film's directors — Oscar-winning film-makers Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor — have been accused of treason by right-wing politicians, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans to legislate against those he claims "smear" Israeli soldiers. Demonstrators gathered outside Szor's parents' home, where protesters called openly for the death penalty.

Photo: Krists Luhaers / Unsplash
Crowds gather on the Venice Lido steps where NAZA provoked one of the festival's longest ovations in recent memory.
Discuss
  • Why might a film being made in Hebrew by Israeli insiders make it harder to dismiss or discredit?
  • What responsibilities, if any, do film festivals have when screening politically dangerous documentaries?
  • Should the excitement some soldiers describe be shown alongside their remorse, or does that risk normalising violence?
WORLD · Culture
All supporting acts withdraw from Ed Sheeran’s tour in solidarity with Macklemore
EUROPE · Culture
‘Very authoritarian, very brutal’: three decades after the UK’s anti-rave crackdown, why is France doing the same?
AMERICAS · Culture
The secret of Mozart’s genius unlocked – has a teenager succeeded where generations of musicologists have failed?
EUROPE · Culture
Oasis will not headline Glastonbury 2027, organiser Emily Eavis confirms
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
iVOCABULARY
bureaucratic euphemismcandour
anonymisedunprecedentedanticipated
legislatemeekest
iiGRAMMAR FOCUS
Discourse markers — contrast and concession (Nevertheless, Whereas, Despite, However, Although, Even though, While)
Contrast and concession markers show that two ideas are in tension or opposition. 'Despite' and 'although' introduce the idea that goes against expectations, while 'whereas', 'while', 'nevertheless', and 'however' highlight a direct contrast between two situations.
Nevertheless · Whereas · Despite · However · Although · Even though · While
  1. The film NAZA received a twenty-five-minute standing ovation at Venice. , in Israel, its directors faced accusations of treason from right-wing politicians.
  2. the scientific evidence on climate change is described as unambiguous, the political response across Europe has drawn sharp criticism for being too weak.
  3. Some of the soldiers interviewed in NAZA spoke with something close to excitement about the strikes. , others appeared genuinely broken by what they had witnessed.
  4. Rushdie published his memoir Knife in 2024, Griffiths released her own account, The Flower Bearers, the following year.
  5. facing death threats and protests outside her parents' home, director Rachel Szor has continued to stand behind the documentary.
  6. Europe experienced its hottest summer on record, killing around 35,000 people. , the continent's leaders moved forward with plans to cut green funding.
iiiDEPENDENT PREPOSITIONS
Complete each phrase with the correct preposition. All from today's articles.
  1. accused ___ treason
  2. powered ___ artificial intelligence
  3. due ___ open in cinemas
  4. placed ___ a long shadow
  5. carried ___ at night
ivCRITICAL THINKING
The soldiers in NAZA speak with what the article calls 'wildly varying registers of remorse' — yet all describe the same programme of killing. What does it tell us about moral accountability when people can participate in the same acts and yet experience them so differently? Does the degree of remorse someone feels change their level of responsibility for what they have done?
vCREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
viWRITING
Rachel Eliza Griffiths wept when her camera arrived — not from grief, but because she felt her identity as an artist being returned to her. Write a short paragraph about an object that represents a part of your identity, and what losing access to it might cost you.
viiDEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong using words from the articles and your own knowledge.
  • cool
  • criticism
  • unhappy
  • response
  • worried
  • harmed
viiiSPEAKING
  1. Should anonymous testimony carry the same weight as named testimony?
  2. Who bears greater responsibility — a soldier or the system that trained them?
  3. When does documenting suffering become a political act?
  4. Is a €180 billion damage bill enough to change government priorities?