theSIGNAL CULTURE
9 September 2026
"Power is not a means; it is an end."
Culture
Photo: Nainoa Shizuru / Unsplash
Liam and Noel Gallagher perform together before a rapturous Cardiff crowd in 2025.

Oasis Brothers Reunite in Stunning Film

Twenty minutes before 74,500 fans erupted inside Cardiff's Principality Stadium on 4 July, Liam Gallagher was nowhere to be found, and his brother Noel was pacing a loading bay, haunted by the ghost of every argument that had silenced them for sixteen years. Then, without ceremony, Liam appeared, took Noel's hand, and walked into a wall of sound that swallowed them both whole. Directors Will Lovelace and Dylan Southern capture that charged reunion in *Oasis: Don't Look Back In Anger*, a documentary tracing the band's Live 25 tour — 41 concerts, 14 countries, five continents, more than two million witnesses — which reveals, quietly and devastatingly, that it was the music itself, not words or apologies, that finally healed what Paris had broken.…
  • Can music genuinely heal a broken relationship, or only disguise its wounds?
Culture
Photo: Nainoa Shizuru / Unsplash
A concert stage bathed in dramatic light, crowds stretching into the dark distance beyond.

Oasis Doc Chooses Charm Over Confession

In a Paris dressing room in 2009, Liam Gallagher smashed his brother Noel's guitar and ended one of rock's most celebrated brotherhoods — yet the new documentary *Don't Look Back In Anger*, which follows Oasis's 2025 comeback tour, declines to explain a single word of what was actually said. The film is warm, handsomely shot, and studiously evasive: fifteen years of silence are bridged by a caption, wounds are declared healed without being shown, and the question of who reached out first is left floating, unanswered, like a chord that never quite resolves.
  • Should music documentaries reveal the full truth, or protect the artists?
"
Elon is a nuke.
Ashley St Clair, conservative commentator and former partner of Elon Musk
Culture

Four Hours to Dissect the World's Most Dangerous Man

Alex Gibney's epic documentary on Elon Musk is as sprawling and unsettling as its subject — and arrives at exactly the right moment.

Ashley St Clair, a former conservative influencer who has both admired and shared a bed with Elon Musk, offers the documentary's most economical verdict: "Elon is a nuke." It is the kind of line that filmmaker Alex Gibney could never have scripted, which is perhaps why he chose to build an entire four-hour film around witnesses of exactly this calibre — people who have orbited the world's richest man closely enough to feel the heat. Gibney's portrait is as sprawling as Musk's own empire, which now encompasses Tesla electric cars, SpaceX rockets, Starlink satellites upon which several nations' militaries have grown dangerously dependent, X — the platform formerly known as Twitter, which has become a vast amplifier of grievance culture — and Grok AI, whose server farms are said to consume extraordinary quantities of fresh water each day. The film does not flinch from the contradictions embedded in this accumulation of power.

When Musk led Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency, he reportedly fired thousands of tax-collection officers, a decision that, far from saving public money, is believed to have widened the very deficit it promised to shrink. Among the film's most affecting voices is Justine Musk, née Wilson, Elon's first wife, who speaks with both intelligence and raw candour about the death of one of their infant children and the particular loneliness of grief beside a man constitutionally incapable of quiet. Errol Musk, Elon's formidably opinionated father, charts the formative pressures of an apartheid-era South African childhood in which his son was bullied and physically beaten. Gibney reaches, wittily, for H.

G. Wells: the 1936 film adaptation of *The Man Who Could Work Miracles*, in which bored cosmic beings bestow supernatural power upon an utterly ordinary earthling.

Photo: Krists Luhaers / Unsplash
Alex Gibney's four-hour documentary asks whether unchecked private power can ever be held to account.
Discuss
  • What responsibilities, if any, should come with owning critical military infrastructure like Starlink?
  • Is it possible to admire someone's achievements while fearing the power they hold?
  • Does a four-hour running time help or hurt a documentary's ability to persuade a wide audience?
AMERICAS · Culture
‘Please find daddy’: the haunting missing posters of September 11
ASIA · Culture
How Gloria Steinem’s lifechanging stay in India shaped her approach to feminism
WORLD · Culture
The next James Bond: the (00)7 questions fans want answered
EUROPE · Culture
‘Bold, brilliant, thrilling’: leading authors on the novels every school should teach
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
iVOCABULARY
calibresprawling
candourformativearbitrariness
studiously evasiveresolves
iiGRAMMAR FOCUS
Reported speech — statements, questions, commands with tense shift
When reporting what someone said, thought, or asked, verbs shift back one tense (e.g. 'is' becomes 'was', 'has' becomes 'had', 'will' becomes 'would'), and pronouns and time expressions change accordingly.
had · was · would · whether · had fired · had become · said
  1. Ashley St Clair said that Elon Musk a nuke — a verdict so sharp the filmmaker built his entire documentary around it.
  2. The article reported that Musk's platform, formerly known as Twitter, a vast amplifier of grievance culture.
  3. Critics observed that when Musk led the Department of Government Efficiency, he reportedly thousands of tax-collection officers.
  4. Justine Musk that she had experienced a particular loneliness when grieving beside a man incapable of quiet.
  5. Errol Musk explained that his son bullied and physically beaten during his apartheid-era South African childhood.
  6. The directors of the Oasis documentary revealed that it the music itself, not words or apologies, that had finally healed the brothers.
iiiPHRASAL VERBS
Match the phrasal verb to its definition. All six appear in today's articles.
  1. flinch from
  2. paper over
  3. build around
  4. reach for
  5. grow dependent on
ivCRITICAL THINKING
Both documentaries feature subjects who have caused significant public harm yet retain enormous popular admiration. To what extent do filmmakers have a duty to challenge that admiration directly, rather than simply presenting witnesses and leaving audiences to judge for themselves?
vCREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
viWRITING
Gibney uses the voices of people who orbited Musk closely — a former partner, his father, his first wife — rather than relying on official sources. Write a short argument either defending or challenging this approach as a method of revealing the truth about a powerful public figure.
viiDEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong using words or phrases from the articles, or your own ideas.
  • interested in
  • reduced
  • upset
  • careful
  • quiet disagreement
  • large
viiiSPEAKING
  1. Which Musk venture worries you most, and why?
  2. Should billionaires face consequences for firing public servants?
  3. Was Liam or Noel more likely to make the first move?
  4. Does evasion in a documentary make you trust it less?