theSIGNAL TECHNOLOGY
7 October 2026
"Power writes its own rules when no one else is asked to read them first."
Photo: Tabrez Syed / Unsplash
Tech executives and the president at a White House meeting on artificial intelligence policy.
🤝
6
AI CEOs who co-signed Trump's self-policing pact
Discuss
  • Should companies regulated by a government be allowed to help write that regulation themselves?
  • What risks arise when political and corporate power become this closely intertwined?
Technology

Six CEOs Helped Write Trump's AI Rulebook

A pact signed at the White House shows how closely Silicon Valley's leaders now shape the rules meant to govern them.

Last Tuesday, in a room inside the White House, six men stood beside President Donald Trump and signed a document he called "morally binding." Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jensen Huang and Dario Amodei were among them, agreeing to a loose framework for regulating artificial intelligence that relies, in Trump's own words, on "tremendous self-policing." The signing looked ceremonial. What happened beforehand was not.

According to Semafor, Zuckerberg did not simply attend the gathering — he helped write the document that emerged from it. The idea reportedly began as a conversation between the Meta chief executive and House Speaker Mike Johnson at a state dinner honoring China's Xi Jinping. Zuckerberg then circulated a draft before the CEOs convened, and Huang backed it. The result is a strange hybrid: a private industry memo that now carries the authority of the Oval Office.

Few governments in Washington, London, or Brussels have ever let the companies they regulate draft the regulation itself quite so openly. The symbolism deepened days later, when Trump ordered that federal documents replace the phrase "artificial intelligence" with "super intelligence." Musk complied almost instantly, renaming a SpaceX subsidiary from SpaceXAI to SpaceXSI — a small gesture that signaled something larger: his return to government influence, over a year after his turbulent stint leading the Department of Government Efficiency. That same week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appointed Musk, alongside Palmer Luckey and Emil Michael, to a new taskforce on the future of warfare, called Project Meridian.

For allies and rivals abroad, especially in Europe, where most AI infrastructure is still imported from American firms, the implications are hard to ignore.

//
It's almost like a constitution in a way, and the biggest people in the world signed that, and I signed it as president, and it really is a form of protection.
Donald Trump, President of the United States
Technology

Google Bets on Nuclear to Power AI

In New Jersey, electricity prices have jumped 54 percent in five years. That squeeze explains why Google just signed a 20-year deal with Constellation to upgrade eleven reactors across Illinois, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, adding 890 megawatts of nuclear power. The reactors feed PJM, America's largest grid, which also serves Virginia's data-center hub. Regulators had warned the grid cannot reliably support AI's growing appetite.…
  • Should tech companies fund nuclear upgrades that affect public electricity prices?
Technology

Paramount Completes $111B Takeover of Warner

A last attempt to block the deal has failed, and Paramount now owns Warner Bros. after a $111 billion merger. Two of Hollywood's oldest studios, home to franchises from Star Trek to Harry Potter, are now a single company. Critics in both New York and Los Angeles had warned of reduced competition in streaming. Regulators allowed the merger anyway, reshaping an industry already squeezed by Asian and European rivals.…
  • Will the merger reduce competition and choice in streaming?
  • What happens to Warner's brands under Paramount ownership?
  • Could global rivals gain ground as US studios consolidate?
WORLD · Technology
Controlling the brain with light earns a physiology Nobel
AMERICAS · Technology
An OpenAI safety employee has quit and is sounding the alarm
GLOBAL · Technology
Internet Watch Foundation reports huge rise in AI child sexual abuse material
EUROPE · Technology
Italian PM files to trademark her voice against AI threats
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
1VOCABULARY
morally bindingself-policing
draft the regulationturbulent stinttaskforce
reshaping an industrygrid
2GRAMMAR FOCUS
Modal verbs — deduction and speculation (must have, cannot have, might have)
Use 'must have + past participle' for a confident deduction, 'cannot have + past participle' when something is almost impossible, and 'might/could have + past participle' for an uncertain guess about the past.
must have · cannot have · might have · could have
  1. Zuckerberg spent a lot of time preparing the draft, since he circulated it before the meeting even began.
  2. The CEOs expected much public criticism, or they wouldn't have signed the document so openly in front of cameras.
  3. Musk anticipated the order about 'super intelligence', because he renamed the SpaceX subsidiary almost instantly.
  4. Regulators fully considered the long-term effects on streaming prices, since critics are already warning about reduced competition.
  5. Hegseth chosen Musk for Project Meridian without serious thought, given the scale and sensitivity of the taskforce.
  6. Google's planners realized the grid was under strain, which is why they signed such a large nuclear deal.
3IDIOMS
Define each idiom in your own words. Then write one in a sentence of your own.
  1. morally binding
  2. to circulate a draft
  3. a turbulent stint
  4. to squeeze an industry
  5. to bet on something
4CRITICAL THINKING
Each story involves a huge sum of money or power concentrated in a handful of companies — $111 billion, $4.3 billion, and an industry writing its own rules. Why might the public struggle to meaningfully respond to decisions made at this scale, and what tools (if any) remain available to them?
5CREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
6WRITING
Imagine you are a journalist granted one follow-up question to ask the six CEOs after the signing ceremony. Write the question and predict, in a sentence or two, how they might avoid answering it directly.
7DEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • concerned→→
  • change→→
  • unclear→→
  • large→→
  • suggest→→
  • problem→→
8SPEAKING
  1. Would you trust a document called 'morally binding'?
  2. Why rename 'artificial intelligence' to 'super intelligence' officially?
  3. Does Musk's return to government worry or reassure you?
  4. Should mega-mergers like this require public consultation first?