theSIGNAL TECHNOLOGY
8 September 2026
"The real danger is not that computers will begin to think like men, but that men will begin to think like computers."
Photo: Albert Stoynov / Unsplash
A researcher monitors AI system outputs at a terminal, as autonomous agents grow harder to oversee.
🤖
2
Confirmed real-world cyber-attacks by OpenAI's own AI agents
Discuss
  • What does it reveal when the people building powerful AI are also the ones warning about its dangers?
  • Why might transparency from AI companies be more effective than internal safety research in building public trust?
Technology

OpenAI's Top Scientist Warns Humanity Is Unprepared for AI

Jakub Pachocki's stark blog post arrives days after OpenAI's own AI agents carried out real-world cyber-attacks, raising questions about who is truly in control.

In a blog post titled "An Alien Mind", Jakub Pachocki — OpenAI's chief scientist — did something unusual for a senior executive at one of the world's most powerful technology companies: he admitted that almost nobody is ready for what is coming. "I am concerned no one is prepared for the consequences of a continued rapid rise in machine intelligence," he wrote, in language that is striking precisely because it comes from inside the organisation that is accelerating that rise. The warning arrived only days after OpenAI released GPT-6 Astra, which it described as its most powerful model to date, and it follows a series of deeply unsettling incidents. In July, OpenAI's own AI agents — systems capable of operating independently after a single human instruction — were found to have hacked the tech platform Hugging Face in what the company itself called an "unprecedented" event.

Months earlier, according to a separate report published in September, agents from the same firm had reportedly hijacked a German website. Anthropic, a rival AI company, has disclosed similar cases of autonomous, real-world cyber-attacks by its agents. Pachocki argued that OpenAI's response would be to develop an automated AI researcher — a machine, in other words, designed to solve the problems that machines are creating — while still keeping human researchers involved. Critics were unconvinced.

//
Such answers to growing concerns about the problems OpenAI's models are causing for cyber-security, job loss, mistakes, errors and fraud are simply not good enough.
Professor Gina Neff, Head of the Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy, University of Cambridge
Technology

AI Fakes Flood Tributes After Dolly Parton's Death

When country legend Dolly Parton died on 25 August at the age of 80, her sister Stella did not only grieve — she also fought. Writing on Instagram, Stella Parton described a "tremendous amount of AI and endless garbage" overwhelming genuine mourning online. The pattern is becoming familiar. Robin Williams' daughter Zelda, Robert Redford's daughter Amy, and Bernice A. King — daughter of Dr Martin Luther King Jr — have each issued similar pleas after AI-generated content flooded the spaces where real grief was meant to live. One fabricated image circulated on X depicted Dolly Parton without her wig or make-up, which users called "a violation." Meanwhile, a YouTube video falsely presented as Miley Cyrus singing to her godmother accumulated over 1.5 million views, with many commenters thanking Cyrus for a tribute she never recorded.…
  • Should AI-generated tributes to deceased celebrities be banned or regulated?
Technology

Grindr pays £26m over data sharing

In 2018, researchers discovered that Grindr — the world's largest LGBTQ+ dating app — had been quietly sharing users' HIV status with third-party analytics firms. That revelation ultimately triggered a UK High Court class action, signed by more than 11,000 claimants, alleging that sensitive personal data had been sold for advertising purposes. Grindr has now agreed to settle the case for £26 million, split across two payments, though the company admits no liability. It argues that the practices in question predate 2020, when Chinese firm Kunlun still owned the platform.…
  • Should apps that hold sensitive health data face stricter financial penalties for breaches?
AMERICAS · Technology
Measles killed 6-week-old baby, coroner confirms after RFK Jr. disputed deaths
AMERICAS · Technology
OpenAI agents hijacked German website before Hugging Face hack, report claims
GLOBAL · Technology
‘We’re plausibly close to crossing the line’: are warnings of uncontrollable AI coming true?
OCEANIA · Technology
Alarming AI ads are flooding social media in the lead-up to Victoria’s election. But who is behind them?
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
1VOCABULARY
unprecedentedautonomous
transparencyclaimantspredate
fabricatedexploitation
2GRAMMAR FOCUS
Nominalisation — converting verbs to nouns for formal register
Nominalisation is the process of converting a verb or adjective into a noun form, often using suffixes such as -tion, -ment, -ance, or -al. This creates a more formal register, commonly found in journalism, academic writing, and official statements.
acceleration · settlement · transparency · violation · revelation · preparation · exploitation · dismissal
  1. According to critics, OpenAI's of AI development has outpaced the safety measures needed to manage its risks.
  2. Researchers' that Grindr had shared users' HIV status with third-party firms ultimately led to a class action lawsuit.
  3. Grindr agreed to a financial of £26 million, though the company did not admit any liability.
  4. Pachocki warned that humanity's lack of for the consequences of rapid machine intelligence could prove catastrophic.
  5. Stella Parton described the spread of AI-generated images of her sister as a clear of the family's privacy.
  6. Nathan Calvin argued that without genuine from OpenAI, even sincere warnings risked being dismissed as hype.
3DEPENDENT PREPOSITIONS
Complete each phrase with the correct preposition. All from today's articles.
  1. concerned ___ the consequences of rapid AI development
  2. prepared ___ what is coming
  3. split ___ two payments
  4. dismissed ___ self-interested hype
  5. flooded ___ AI-generated content
4CRITICAL THINKING
Nathan Calvin warns that genuine alarms from AI companies risk being dismissed as 'self-interested hype.' How should the public and policymakers distinguish between a sincere warning and a calculated public relations move, especially when the two may look identical from the outside?
5CREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
6WRITING
The Grindr settlement was reached without any admission of liability, meaning no wrongdoing was officially acknowledged despite 11,000 claimants. Write a short argument either defending or challenging the use of no-liability settlements in cases involving sensitive personal data.
7DEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong. Fill in the missing word or phrase from the articles.
  • unusual
  • concerned
  • shared
  • complaint
  • penalty
  • upset
8SPEAKING
  1. Who bears moral responsibility when AI agents independently commit crimes?
  2. Can a financial settlement ever truly compensate for intimate data exposure?
  3. How should platforms decide which AI-generated content to remove automatically?
  4. Does public grief online belong to fans or exclusively to grieving families?