theSIGNAL SPORT
19 October 2026
"Power without legitimacy is only performance; legitimacy without scrutiny is only habit."
Sport

Martínez Fractures Jaw, Promises Quick Return

Eight minutes. That is how long medics work on Emiliano Martínez at Hill Dickinson Stadium after he collides with Everton defender Jarrad Branthwaite. Then comes the stretcher, and then the hospital. The verdict: a fractured jaw, plus concussion, according to manager Xabi Alonso. By Sunday, the 34-year-old Argentine is posting from his hospital bed. The operation went well, he writes, and he will be back "in a few weeks". His priority, he insists, is the 2-0 win and the clean sheet. Mike Penders, 21, steps in. The Belgian, signed from Genk in 2024, has spent two seasons on loan.…
  • Can a 21-year-old goalkeeper handle Premier League pressure after only a substitute debut?
Sport

England Shrinks Kids' Football to Three-a-Side

Six-year-olds in England now play 3v3: no goalkeepers, no referees, no substitutes. The FA says two years of research proves more touches mean more engagement. Coaches like Collingham's Michael Bland juggle three pitches, nine children and unsafe tackles. Others fear one dominant child will hog the ball.…
  • Could three-a-side football help shy children, or let one dominant player take over?
"
The prize will reward individuals who have taken exceptional and extraordinary actions for peace and by doing so have united people across the world.
Fifa, announcing the peace prize in November 2024
Photo: Jelly Dollar / Unsplash
Fifa's golden peace trophy, first presented in Washington, now faces calls for reform or abolition.
Sport

Fifa's Peace Prize Faces Its Own Reckoning

Fifa council members have told Gianni Infantino to overhaul or scrap the peace prize, leaving Donald Trump as its likely sole political winner.

A golden trophy, a medal, a certificate, and a hall full of cameras in Washington. That was how Donald Trump received the first Fifa peace prize at the World Cup draw last December. Now, barely a year later, the award is fighting for its life. At Thursday's meeting of the Fifa council, Gianni Infantino was told to make major changes or kill the prize altogether.

Several members demanded abolition, according to the Guardian, while others pressed for it to be depoliticised. Infantino opened the session by announcing that the prize had been handed to Fifa's football social responsibility committee, and members returned to the issue later during questions about conflicts of interest. That committee must make a recommendation before the next council meeting in Doha on 16 December. The worry is double-edged.

Many members feel the prize is tainted by its link to Trump, and some fear a diplomatic storm if the US president dislikes the next recipient. Article two of Fifa's statutes bans political or governmental interference in football, which is one reason the original decision caused such a backlash. The process that led to his selection has never been made public. Abolition may still be avoided, because the 22-person committee is dominated by representatives from countries loyal to Infantino, and scrapping the prize would humiliate him.

🏆
22
members sit on the committee now deciding the prize's fate
Discuss
  • Should sports governing bodies ever give awards to sitting politicians, or does it always compromise their independence?
  • Why might committee members loyal to Infantino avoid abolishing a prize that many council members find embarrassing?
  • How does Fifa's own rule against political interference clash with honouring a political leader on a World Cup stage?
  • A prize for individuals in football who promote social harmony could work. What safeguards would make its selection process credible?
  • Is it possible for any global sporting body to stay politically neutral while hosting tournaments in powerful countries? There may be no right answer.
EUROPE · Sport
The Florian Wirtz mystery: why has he not found Leverkusen form at Liverpool?
AMERICAS · Sport
If livestreaming an execution is an outrage, is looking at old photos of them OK? | Brief letters
GLOBAL · Sport
How one rule change is altering the face of one-day cricket
OCEANIA · Sport
‘Not acceptable’: Kiss blasts humiliated Wallabies as All Blacks claim 13th straight Bledisloe win
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
1VOCABULARY
depoliticisedbacklash
conflicts of interestabolitionrecipient
clausetainted
2GRAMMAR FOCUS
Gerunds and infinitives — complex patterns (stop to do vs stop doing)
Some verbs change meaning depending on the form that follows: 'stop/remember/try + gerund' describes the action itself, while 'stop/remember/try + to-infinitive' describes a purpose, a duty or an attempt. Other verbs, such as 'risk', 'involve' and 'fail', take only one pattern.
to dislike · scrapping · to make · to rule out · playing · to return · posting
  1. Members of the Fifa council were told major changes to the prize or abolish it altogether.
  2. Some officials fear that the prize completely would humiliate Gianni Infantino.
  3. The committee must recommend a solution, and one proposal involves politicians from receiving the award.
  4. Several members risk a diplomatic storm if the US president happens the next recipient.
  5. Emiliano Martínez insisted he would be back soon and refused out a quick return after the operation.
  6. From his hospital bed, the goalkeeper didn't stop messages to his fans, even after the surgery.
3IDIOMS
Define each idiom in your own words. Then write one in a sentence of your own.
  1. fighting for its life
  2. double-edged
  3. a diplomatic storm
  4. to scrap something
  5. a footnote nobody can repeat
4CRITICAL THINKING
Both stories involve people being moved suddenly into roles or situations they did not choose: a prize passed to a committee, a young goalkeeper thrust into the spotlight, six-year-olds placed in a new format. Who should decide when change is necessary, and how much say should the people most affected, such as players, children and parents, have in those decisions? Consider whether change imposed from above is ever truly fair.
5CREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
6WRITING
Write a short letter (about 120 words) from a Fifa council member to the football social responsibility committee, explaining what you hope its recommendation will be before the December meeting in Doha and why. Use at least two of the idioms from this page.
7DEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • The prize has attracted some criticism.→→
  • Some members are uneasy about the award.→→
  • The decision caused a little embarrassment.→→
  • The goalkeeper picked up a knock.→→
  • The medics checked on him briefly.→→
  • Some coaches have reservations about the new format.→→
8SPEAKING
  1. Describe a rule you think is too strict. What would you change?
  2. When is a public apology enough, and when is resignation necessary?
  3. How do you stay calm when plans fall apart at the last minute?
  4. Which sport would benefit most from a major change in its rules?