Britain's spy chief says artificial intelligence could raise the danger of biological weapons, and a leading health-security expert explains why governments are uneasy.
Once a year, the head of MI5 steps up to a podium and tells Britain what keeps him awake. This year, Sir Ken McCallum chose a phrase that sounds almost like a gambler's warning: artificial intelligence, he said, has the potential to "change the stakes" on bioweapons. Which stakes? And how?
To find out, the Guardian's Ian Sample turned to Dr Tom Inglesby, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, based within the Bloomberg School of Public Health in the United States. His field is an odd one. Inglesby and his colleagues spend their days imagining outbreaks that nobody wants to imagine, so that governments can prepare for them. The worry, broadly, is that AI tools might lower the barriers to dangerous biology.
They could make specialist knowledge easier to reach, or speed up work that once demanded years of training. The concern covers existing threats, and possibly new ones too. Notice the hedging, though. Officials speak of "potential", not of certainty.