theSIGNAL SCIENCE
15 October 2026
"What we choose to count reveals what we have chosen to value."
Science

Australia's Lost Millions: A Census 237 Years Late

New modelling suggests 2.22 million Indigenous people lived in Australia in 1788, far more than long assumed, and that almost all were lost.

How do you count people nobody counted? For nearly a century, the answer in Australia was: badly. In the 1930s, the anthropologist Alfred Radcliffe-Brown put the Indigenous population before colonization at about 250,000. That figure shaped textbooks, museum labels and political arguments for generations.

Now a national research team says it was far too low. Their new estimate is 2.22 million people living on the continent when the First Fleet arrived in 1788, in some comparisons up to seven times earlier calculations. Professor Corey Bradshaw of Flinders University, who contributed to the work, is part of a centre that collaborates with Indigenous partners on the project.

The method is a little like detective work. The researchers did not rely on a single clue. They combined ethnographic observations, archaeological findings, genetic reconstructions and computer models. They also asked a simple but clever question: how many people could each environment, from tropical coast to desert edge, realistically have supported?

When several independent lines of evidence point to the same range, the answer becomes harder to dismiss.

Photo: Moments For Life Photography / Unsplash
Arid central Australian landscape, where researchers tested how many people different environments could have supported before 1788.
Discuss
  • Why might a historical population estimate influence how a nation understands colonization, even today?
  • The team combined genetics, archaeology and computer models. Which type of evidence would you trust most, and why?
  • Radcliffe-Brown admitted his estimate had limits. How should scholars treat influential figures that later prove to be wrong?
Science

The Overlooked Peptide That May Fuel Alzheimer's

Over 400 clinical trials, billions of dollars, and still no clear victory against Alzheimer's. Could scientists have been staring at the wrong suspect? UC Santa Cruz biochemist Jevgenij Raskatov thinks so. He argues that P3, a small peptide long dismissed as harmless, can form toxic clumps and may interact with amyloid beta.…
  • If P3 matters, how should researchers decide which failed Alzheimer's drug ideas deserve a second look?
∞
Understanding the size of Indigenous populations in Australia before European invasion in 1788 is essential to truth-telling and reconciliation.
Professor Corey Bradshaw, Global Ecology Professor, Flinders University
Science

The Forgotten Fossil That Would Have Chased Us

For nearly a century, a small skull fragment sat quietly in London's Natural History Museum. Nobody noticed what it was. Then UCL researchers looked again. It belonged to Invictibellatrix amberina, a tiger-sized, feathered predator with claws up to 20 centimetres long. It stalked Britain 120 million years ago, and it is Europe's first known megaraptoran. It was no apex predator, yet humans would have been ideal prey.…
  • What other undiscovered species might be sitting forgotten in museum drawers around the world?
WORLD · Science
Scientists make stunning discovery that could help explain why life exists
GLOBAL · Science
AI can act exactly like a human, but we still don't think it's conscious
AFRICA · Science
NASA spots a giant patch of Moon-like rock on Earth
OCEANIA · Science
Crew searching for Amelia Earhart arrives at crab-infested island
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
1VOCABULARY
ethnographicapex predator
frontier violencetruth-tellingindependent lines of evidence
dismissedreconciliation
2GRAMMAR FOCUS
Wish and if only — expressing regret
Use 'wish' or 'if only' + past simple for present regrets, 'wish' or 'if only' + past perfect for regrets about the past, and 'wish' + would for things that annoy us or that we want to change. After 'wish' and 'if only', 'were' is often used instead of 'was'.
had · hadn't · were · would · didn't · could · had been
  1. Many historians wish earlier researchers taken disease and frontier violence into account when estimating the Indigenous population.
  2. If only Radcliffe-Brown ignored the structural violence that devastated communities after 1788, his figure might have been more accurate.
  3. Campaigners say they wish the 250,000 figure never been repeated in school textbooks for generations.
  4. Some scientists wish Alzheimer's drug trials looked at the peptide P3 decades ago, before billions of dollars were spent.
  5. If only the Natural History Museum's skull fragment been examined properly years earlier, the new predator might have been identified much sooner.
  6. Researchers sometimes wish they more complete fossils, because a single skull fragment tells them so little about the animal's body.
3IDIOMS
Define each idiom in your own words. Then write one in a sentence of your own.
  1. to be wide of the mark
  2. to point the finger at someone or something
  3. a red herring
  4. to leave no stone unturned
  5. back to square one
4CRITICAL THINKING
Each of these stories involves experts being wrong for a very long time, whether about a population, a disease or a fossil. What conditions allow a mistaken idea to survive for decades without being challenged? Consider the role of authority, funding and habit, and suggest one practical way institutions could make it easier to question long-held assumptions.
5CREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the top story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
6WRITING
Imagine you are a museum curator who has just discovered that a label you wrote years ago is based on figures now proven wrong. Write a short note (about 120 words) to visitors explaining what has changed and how you will correct it.
7DEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • The earlier estimate was inaccurate.→→
  • The population fell noticeably.→→
  • The finding is a bit surprising.→→
  • The skull fragment was easy to overlook.→→
  • Alzheimer's research has made little headway.→→
  • The predator was fairly dangerous.→→
8SPEAKING
  1. Which scientific mystery would you most like to see solved?
  2. Have you ever changed your mind after learning new facts?
  3. Would you want to see a living dinosaur? Why or why not?
  4. Should governments fund research that might lead nowhere?