As prediction platforms report explosive growth in weather bets, scientists warn that gamifying the climate emergency distances the public from its human cost.
On the morning the Los Angeles fires crested the hills above Pacific Palisades in January 2025, some people were watching the smoke on television. Others were placing bets on it. Large wagers appeared on US prediction platforms Kalshi and Polymarket as the flames spread — a detail that shocked climate scientist Kaitlyn Trudeau of Climate Central, whose own grandfather lost his home in those fires. Both platforms have since banned wildfire betting, citing the risk of incentivising arson, but the episode exposed something broader: a fast-growing market that now treats planetary breakdown as a financial opportunity.
Kalshi, one of the largest US-based prediction markets, reported 500% growth in weather and climate wagers over the past year, pushing that segment of its business to a valuation of $1.1 billion. The company has since partnered with the Weather Company, owner of the Weather Channel, to lend scientific credibility to its climate-related contracts. Rival platform Polymarket, which gained prominence during the 2024 US election cycle, is also expanding into weather-related bets.
Together, they now allow users to stake money on outcomes ranging from tomorrow's urban temperature to the pace of Arctic ice loss — variables that, until recently, were the exclusive province of peer-reviewed modelling. For many climate researchers, this commercialisation of uncertainty crosses a line. "I'm not against prediction markets in general, but we need to be clear about the downsides," Trudeau said. "They aren't going to reduce the risks of climate change or solve climate change.
" Her concern is structural: when suffering becomes a tradable asset, the incentive shifts from prevention to prediction. The same data that should motivate policy action is instead absorbed into a pricing mechanism that profits regardless of the outcome.