From Trump voters in rural Indiana to progressive activists in Indianapolis, a rare bipartisan fury is forcing Big Tech to reckon with the true cost of the AI boom.
At a summer festival in Monrovia, Indiana — a town of just 1,600 people — community organiser Bryce Gustafson spoke to fifty residents about a proposed 550-acre Google datacenter. Not one of them wanted it. Several pulled him aside to say the same thing: they had voted for Donald Trump, and they could not understand why their president was backing a project like this. For Gustafson, lead organiser at the Citizens Action Coalition, it was one of the clearest signs yet that something unusual is happening across the American midwest.
What began as scattered local resistance has since grown into a coordinated national movement. Over the past year, opposition to Big Tech's relentless datacenter expansion has swept from rural counties to suburban townships to historically Black urban neighbourhoods such as Martindale-Brightwood in Indianapolis. The grievances are consistent: facilities that consume enormous quantities of water, degrade local air quality, and are imposed on communities with little meaningful consultation. Three-quarters of Americans now oppose datacenter development in their area — a shift of more than 30 percentage points in a single year.
More than 500 counties and municipalities have passed bans or moratoria, and the political consequences have been swift. Utah's state senate president lost his position after backing hyperscale proposals; nationally, Senators Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have called for a full federal moratorium. The industry and its allies in Washington were slow to read these signals, initially dismissing the backlash as routine not-in-my-backyard opposition. That calculation now looks dangerously complacent.