theSIGNAL CULTURE
25 June 2026
"The most dangerous moment is when everyone is certain they are the one acting in self-defence."
Culture
Photo: Adhitya Sibikumar / Unsplash
A shop worker stands behind a counter, unaware of a nearby camera recording them.

Smart Glasses, Hidden Cameras, Uneasy Workers

When a shop assistant in England discovered he had appeared, without his knowledge, in a TikTok video posted by former television presenter Michael Barrymore, he had not been asked for permission — only stumbled upon his own face, framed by someone else's lens. …
  • Should wearing camera glasses in shops be treated as a criminal offence?
Culture
Photo: Sam McGhee / Unsplash
A television studio camera stands ready, symbolising the media world Stefanovic dominated for years.

A Podcast Ends a TV Dynasty

For nearly two decades, Karl Stefanovic was the familiar, slightly rumpled face that millions of Australians woke up to each morning on the breakfast programme Today — a man who had survived on-air scandals, plummeting ratings, and tabloid storms with remarkable resilience. …
  • Should broadcasters be held responsible for their stars' independent podcast content?
"
We are trapped in a lack of reciprocal trust, and we sleepwalk through these patterns of everybody becoming more armed, more aggressive.
Carlo Rovelli, theoretical physicist and author of 85 Seconds to Midnight
Culture

The Physicist Who Says Rearmament Is the Real Danger

Carlo Rovelli's new book argues that Europe's rush to rearm is not a solution to nuclear fear — it is the source of it.

There is a clock that has been ticking since 1947, and Carlo Rovelli has named his new book after it. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' Doomsday Clock currently stands at 89 seconds to midnight — the closest it has ever been to symbolic annihilation — yet the Italian theoretical physicist, who is 70 years old and speaks with the unhurried calm of someone who has spent decades thinking about time itself, believes that the loudest alarm is the one nobody is hearing. That alarm, he argues in *85 Seconds to Midnight: A Physicist's Argument against Rearmament*, is not the sound of Russian tanks but of our own collective sleepwalking toward catastrophe. Rovelli is careful with his distinctions.

He does not dismiss the suffering in Ukraine, nor the complexity of the war that Russia began. What he challenges, with the precision of a man accustomed to dismantling elegant-seeming theories, is the assumption that more weapons make Europe safer. Russia, he notes, commands only around four percent of global military spending, while NATO accounts for roughly forty percent — a disparity that makes the narrative of an unstoppable Russian juggernaut difficult to sustain. And yet Russia holds more than 4,000 nuclear warheads, more than any other nation on earth, which means it cannot simply be defeated into silence.

The most unsettling passage in his argument concerns what happened recently in St Petersburg, where Ukrainian forces, using weapons supplied by Britain, Germany, and France, struck a city inside a nuclear-armed state.

Photo: Mina Rad / Unsplash
Carlo Rovelli photographed in London ahead of the publication of his anti-rearmament polemic.
Discuss
  • What does Rovelli mean when he says Europe is 'sleepwalking' through patterns of rearmament?
  • Why might it matter that China has pledged never to use nuclear weapons first, while Russia and the US have not?
  • How does the history of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis help explain Russia's current fear of NATO expansion?
  • Is it ever possible to negotiate with a country that has nuclear weapons when trust has already broken down?
  • Do you think supplying weapons to another country makes the supplier morally responsible for how those weapons are used?
AMERICAS · Culture
Bad Bunny sparks UK’s Latino moment as 100,000 fans line up to see him perform
WORLD · Culture
How to Live on Earth review – Benedict Cumberbatch exudes positivity in response to the climate crisis
AMERICAS · Culture
Jabs, human ash and a tapeworm: behind the appetite for a new kind of disordered eating movie
ASIA · Culture
Childbirth room? It’s next to the period room … the astonishing Kerala homes designed for women’s bodies
theSIGNAL IN THE LAB
iVOCABULARY
sleepwalking toward catastrophedisparity
juggernautunprecedenteddeterrent
resilienceattention economy
iiGRAMMAR FOCUS
Relative clauses — defining vs non-defining with commas
A defining relative clause identifies which person or thing we mean and is written without commas (e.g. 'the book that he wrote'). A non-defining relative clause adds extra information about something already identified and is separated from the main clause by commas (e.g. 'Carlo Rovelli, who is 70, believes...').
who · which · whose · that · where · whom
  1. Carlo Rovelli, is an Italian theoretical physicist, argues that rearmament makes Europe less safe.
  2. The Doomsday Clock, currently stands at 89 seconds to midnight, has never been closer to symbolic annihilation.
  3. The shop assistant face appeared in Barrymore's TikTok video had not given his permission to be filmed.
  4. St Petersburg is a city Ukrainian forces, using Western-supplied weapons, recently struck.
  5. Tommy Robinson, real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was interviewed on Stefanovic's podcast.
  6. The podcast episode caused the controversy was pulled within hours of being published.
  7. Karl Stefanovic, had survived many on-air scandals, finally faced the end of his contract at Nine Entertainment.
iiiPHRASAL VERBS
Match the phrasal verb (1–6) to its correct definition (A–F). All six appear in today's articles.
  1. 1. stumble upon
  2. 2. rise to (fame)
  3. 3. wake up to
  4. 4. reach back (to)
  5. 5. pull (something)
  6. 6. bring (something) to the edge
ivCRITICAL THINKING
Rovelli argues that a long-held nuclear deterrent — the assumption that possessing nuclear weapons protects a country from being struck — has been quietly broken. If that unspoken guarantee no longer holds, what new rules, if any, might govern the use of weapons supplied by one country to another? And who, realistically, has the authority to set them?
vCREATIVE · HEADLINES
Write a headline for the Rovelli rearmament story in each of the following styles. One line each, no explanation:
  • TABLOID NEWSPAPER
  • LUXURY MAGAZINE
  • ACTIVIST BLOG
viWRITING
A shop worker, a TV presenter's departure, and a physicist's warning about nuclear weapons all raise the same underlying question: how much damage can be done before anyone in authority acts? Choose one of the three stories and argue that the harm could — or could not — have been prevented with earlier intervention.
viiDEGREES OF EXTREMITY
Complete each ladder from mild to strong.
  • concerned→→
  • disagreement→→
  • uncomfortable→→
  • criticism→→
  • noted→→
  • setback→→
  • hesitant→→
viiiSPEAKING
  1. Does military spending size actually determine who starts a war?
  2. Can a journalist's past reputation ever become a professional liability?
  3. Should nuclear deterrence still be treated as a reliable peace guarantee?
  4. Who bears responsibility when a worker is filmed without consent?
  5. Is podcast independence compatible with holding a major broadcast role?